|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why wasn't PanAm 103 Over Lockerbie Treated the Same?Reader comment on item: EgyptAir Probe Uncovers Anti-Americanism Submitted by bms, Tripoli, Libya (United States), Jun 27, 2007 at 15:02 Doesn't Conspiracy thinking dominate American and Western thinking when it comes to Arabs and Muslims? So, why deny the same free thought for other people? Imagine if PanAm 103 crashed over Libya and the Libyan authorities conducted the investigation solo and without intervention from outside, would the U.S. government and American public have accepted the results of Libya's investigation? Would they have believed that the PanAm flight's pilot purposely committed suicide and crashed or blew up the plane? The Americans and the Europeans always sent their own investigating teams in any accident that took place and involving American or European personne and did not accept the opinion of any one else. This arrogance, double standards and hegemony is what gives bad taste for the West not only in the Middle East, but everywhere. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (3) on this item
![]() |
![]() Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |