Oliver's ad hominem

Submitted by zzazzeefrazzee (United States), Mar 16, 2008 at 16:42

Claiming that I suffer from "dhimmitude" is a ridiculous assertion, given that i don't live under Islamic hegemony in any way. The only reason that you even stoop to such a claim is do to the fact that I ADAMANTLY disagree with your own personal hostile sectarian sanctimonious views Those dogmatic views are not in any way reflective of all Christians, and are rooted in very poor grasp of history, languages, and cultures of the region.

Call me names all you want- it doesn't make you any more "right". Nor is there any "winning" of this argument. Despite stating taht you could "agree to disagree", I really doubt you can honestly do that, as you would accuse those who disagree of blasphemy, which is not really "agreeing to disagree", now is it?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".