69 million page views

London flashpoint

Reader comment on item: Accept Shari'a in the West?

Submitted by Andrew Kyle (United Kingdom), Aug 1, 2009 at 07:41

What benefit has Islam brought to host Western nations who have welcomed, housed, provided jobs, provided education for thier children, changed their laws to favour and protect and ensure platforms for Islamic ideology and worship - what benefit has Islam repayed those nations with? Countries of Western Europe unceasingly work to accommodate the Islamic perpective and in return there seems to be only irrational hate and anger. If Muslims don't like living in the U.K. - LEAVE.

The worst thing about the issue of Islamic immigration to Western nations is the fact that displying any kind of objection to it is condemned as racist and illegal.

I was born and raised in London. The levels of islamic immigration - something that the British people were never consulted on and never voted for - has transformed London into a collection of frightened, alienated subcultures. My city - and yes, it is MY CITY, has been transformed into an unrecognisable mess. The multi-cultural experiment has failed yet the British government ignore the growing problem. And Islamic immigration IS A PROBLEM. The indiginous people feel betrayed and cast out in their own land, and they feel that voicing any kind of protest or even an opinion will alienate them further. This will simply lead to simmering resentment and the development of an underground far-right wing ideology.

The current British government has ensured a volatile future and our capital city will be the flashpoint.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The problem with 'Sharia Court' is the 'Sharia' and not the 'Court' [768 words]PrashantAug 4, 2018 12:03244090
2al-Shari'a al-Islamiyya [390 words]dhimmi no moreAug 6, 2018 15:13244090
Bible abuse [57 words]kaariganSep 25, 2010 06:26178674
when will they ever learn... [27 words]donvanMay 11, 2010 15:22172579
Tribal tribunals incivilized world!!! [93 words]Muslimk***May 10, 2010 03:52172485
Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone) [173 words]P C ManiSep 13, 2009 00:19161454
Sharia in India [71 words]AjayMay 10, 2010 09:12161454
London flashpoint [240 words]Andrew KyleAug 1, 2009 07:41159507
Superstition based policing? [32 words]EdSJul 26, 2009 18:32159320
United Nations attempting to silence all speech against Islam [502 words]dianeDec 2, 2008 00:22144264
Sharia Law [69 words]Egil UlateigAug 31, 2007 11:32107380
1Australian PM John Howard gave the right response re.imposing sharia. [48 words]M.D'SouzaMay 29, 2007 20:5095178
1Your sentiment is right but the danger is deeper [79 words]George PAug 12, 2009 22:4195178
Forget it [59 words]David W. LincolnMay 28, 2007 16:2095048
Necessary precautions [42 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKMay 28, 2007 07:4895002

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)