and what about the bombing of Israel, india and Pakistan? they already got nukes!

Submitted by amir (United States), Feb 2, 2010 at 22:46

see... the easiest solutions are sometimes the most... i've no idea that when wars in iraq, afghanistan, pakistan are not enough, creating another front like Iran will change everything towards positive in the global security? it is pathetic to see such a war-mongering mindset and truly detested at suggestions like that. don't interfere in nobody's country. if you are really that much afraid of your "enemy", then why don't you suggest nuking the whole civilian populations out there like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But the problem is that now there are not just a few cities with enemy's civilian population, enemy exists in more than thousands of cities out there. do you have enough nukes? i know there are ENOUGH to destroy earth many times but for pete's sake, sanity's sake, why destruction? why not peace, why not bearing each other in harmony and trying to accept differences and living like we have all been living together since thousands of years. what is so new which is bothering that much to destroy peace on earth? two wars are already being fought in iraq, afghanistan and pakistan. how many more fronts it will take to really win the war? and war against who?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".