69 million page views

Dealing with Muslims in the Mideast

Reader comment on item: Guidelines for U.S. Policy toward the Middle East

Submitted by John Noble (United States), Oct 2, 2012 at 00:47

Our relations with Muslim leaders should be based on making it clear that any attack on Israel by an Islamic country or their proxies would result in a U.S. military takeover of the attacking country, and the elimination of the practice of Islam, which the United States deems to be a totalitarian crime syndicate with a religious front. We should further warn Islamic nations that if if becomes necessary for the U.S. to get involved in defending its ally Israel, all Mosques will be demolished and all Muslims will be deported and combatants executed. A military governor would be installed to oversee the transition of a western style government with the new inhabitants from other nations, untarnished by the venom of the false Prophet. If that draws other nations into the conflict, nuclear weapons will be administered as necessary until all Islamic threats are neutralized. A nuclear solution is probably the best way to discourage the virulent growth of anti-Semitism, and bring peace to the Middle East. Otherwise, there is no other way to stop the atrocities that have characterized Islam since Mohammad appointed himself spokesman for the false god "Allah," which was the crescent Moon god of the Arab world, the chief idol of Arabian idol worshippers for hundreds of years before his time. The mind control game that has resulted in Sharia compliance can be stopped by taking a hard right turn. Western nations must understand that (a) freedom is a Judeo-Christian concept that came out of the Bible, and (b) Muslims are modern day Canaanites who they cannot be rehabilitated as long as they belong to that cult. Islam itself cannot be reformed. Muslims must either leave Islam or be militarily defeated. That should be our message, and we should be resolved to back it up with action.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Concur with Mr Noble [123 words]Evan CowartOct 9, 2012 22:50199653
problem with SOUND SYSTEM [32 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.Oct 2, 2012 11:24199384
1Dear Mr.Daniel Pipes [15 words]Nicola RussoOct 2, 2012 09:26199380
2Dealing with Muslims in the Mideast [301 words]John NobleOct 2, 2012 00:47199363
True but not realistic [54 words]MLBOct 3, 2012 03:12199363
1Sharia-Free Middle-East [36 words]Michael Hanni MorcosOct 2, 2012 00:25199362

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)