69 million page views

Indian and non Arab Muslims in some ways are worse than dhimmis

Reader comment on item: Arabian Sex Tourism Updated

Submitted by Shishir (United Arab Emirates), Apr 16, 2013 at 09:04

We see in this case, a couple of Hyderabad (from where I hail) encouraging their daughter to copulate with this Sudanese "gentleman" in return for a 100k rs (trust me, this doesnt get you very far in the new India). The first thought of anyone reading it would be that the motiviation for parents to hand over their daughters (in the case of Afghans, also their sons) for the satisfying the perverse sexual appetites of Arab visitors would be tempted to blame the rampant poverty which compels them to do this. But they would be mistaken. It is because non-Arab Muslims hold Arabs in such high esteem that it borders on the mystical.

VS Naipaul spoke of this in Among the Believers where he refers to non Arab Muslims as little Arabs as they are culturally compelled to denigrate their non Muslim history and heritage in order to mould themselves to this Arabian import. I have personally met various Indian and Pakistani Muslims who venerated the average Arab as if he were a demigod despite all evidence to the contrary.

Let me give you an anecdotal example: a couple of years ago a tape surfaced of one of the brothers of the ruler of UAE indulging in very brutal torture of an Afghan merchant as the former accused him of swindling $5,000. There are been pretty much zero protests his actions, not in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan and definitely not in the UAE. So much so that one of my Pakistani friends on Facebook asked his friend to take down that video as in his words "it was racist against Arabs"

As long they exist Indian, Pakistani, Afghans, Indonesian, Malaysian and others (but the former in particular) will grovel and degrade themselves before Arab Muslims (even one of low status such as Sudanese in this story) till the end of time to the extant of knowingly prostituting their daughters for a few pieces of silver.

One is reminded of the Babylonian custom where all attractive women were required to cohabit with the priests of Marduk or Ishtar at some point in their life to gain religious merit.

A similar primitive thought process, I believe, applies here.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Sunni? [30 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AlbertE.Nov 20, 2016 00:58234178
1It continues unabated [18 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
VijayApr 29, 2013 08:53205725
5Indian and non Arab Muslims in some ways are worse than dhimmis [366 words]ShishirApr 16, 2013 09:04205221
1Malaysia Muslims [72 words]RajaApr 16, 2013 22:08205221
2Victims of Arabian imperialism [217 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2013 17:34205221
In Kerala too [18 words]WilsonApr 22, 2013 02:48205221
1Kerala is a different story [173 words]ShishirApr 23, 2013 04:37205221
All true but there is a flip side to the Arab contempt and "low" Indian status [383 words]ShishirApr 23, 2013 04:50205221
1Shcked [13 words]grlroxDec 9, 2010 19:06180825
1They are hypocrites [17 words]eijnujNov 4, 2010 15:14179921

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)