69 million page views

If I may add; do not yield to CAIR bullying

Reader comment on item: Which Privileges for Islam?
in response to reader comment: CAIR gets away with bullying

Submitted by Raid Mohammad (United States), Mar 29, 2005 at 13:29

Like bullies, CAIR will throw at you everything in the book in the hope that some of it will stick. Yielding to CAIR McCarthyism style intimidations will give victory to censorship. It will mean condoning and tolerating bullies and all that they stand for.

Any sincere work should and must start from the inside out. When the West attacks "Islam," it is attacking the "Islam" it has come to know through our conduct and action -- or inaction. It is so ironic that CAIR can dare to cry foul when most of these arguments against "Islam" are deduced from "Muslims"' sources most "Muslims" deemed to be most reliable. The Majority of "Muslims" started to defame and defile the Prophet the moment the Prophet past away. "Muslims" systematically shredded all the moral values that the Prophet devoted all of his life to. "Muslims" slaughtered and/or poisoned to death the progeny of the Prophet one after another without blinking an eye. Only when it serves their pocket books do "Muslims" ever remember that Muhammad was their Prophet. These kinds of "Muslims" are nothing but monsters of hypocrisy.

The damage that was done to "Muslims" was self-inflicted. For 1,400 years, we "Muslims" have been demonizing and brutalizing our own minorities, long before anybody else started to demonize us. We killed our inner selves long before any body else killed our heartless bodies. We "Muslims" demand from the West the things that we cannot achieve within ourselves as individuals, let alone as nations.

Where is CAIR when it comes to the oppressing policies of those who are in charge of Muslims' Mosques here in the US? CAIR philosophy is that if it is Muslims' filth; just cover it with a colorful rug. In contrast, if it has to do with the US society, milk it for what it is worth. CAIR has no strategy except that of instructing their hounds on when, where and how loud to bark, provided that this barking will bring CAIR some gain. Other than that, CAIR could hardly care.

I wonder how Americans would react if they found out that CAIR just might have had the chance to prevent 9.11 atrocities. I begged CAIR in the summer of 2000 to take a more active role in educating Mosques' leaders of the potential danger in allowing certain fundraising activities conducted by shadowy individuals or organizations. What I concluded from my efforts that summer is that CAIR feels that its time is too valuable to be wasted on issues other than PR. They told me, in essence "This is the situation in all the Mosques throughout North America". In other words, this situation is none of their concern. The reality is that as long as Mosques provide CAIR the platform that it needs to raise money, Mosques' internal affairs is none of CAIR business. CAIR executive director excused the lack of leadership in this area with the statement that, "limited resources limit the scope of CAIR mission," yet they willingly waste their "limited resources" in only pursuing cases that will bring them some glory and fame. In his response to my prodding CAIR to take a role, their spokesman called it a "community dispute." In his response to me in his Oct., 19, 2000 email he stated, "As a matter of policy, CAIR does not get involved in community disputes." Little matter that "community disputes" may provide clues to larger problems with far-reaching implications, indeed.

CAIR is doing its best to manipulate the American-Muslim community through phobia. A close examination of CAIR daily list serve postings will reveal their true intentions. When the Taliban were slaughtering thousands of innocent Afghanis, CAIR condoned it or at least kept quiet about it. When the US went there to cure this epidemic that is called Taliban and Bin Laden, CAIR cried foul. As an Iraqi- American my self, I find CAIR to be very ironic. While their role model Saddam was annihilating the Iraqis, CAIR was condoning it or at least kept quiet about it. When the US went to get rid of Saddam, they once again cried foul. In both cases CAIR never failed to circulate any and all articles that would tarnish the image of the US. They continuously circulate articles with clear anti American sentiments. Their disinformation is very damaging and very misleading.

I am not trying to belittle the death and destruction of innocent lives in these operations. However, CAIR manipulation of these articles to suit their mission of spreading phobia among Muslims in the US is very dangerous. It will spare no effort to mislead the American-Muslims. The disinformation campaign that CAIR is waging can have very grave consequences in our society here in the US. CAIR cashes in on the phobias and naiveté of Muslims, who believe the CAIR claim that it is a "civil rights organization". By manipulating the emotions of the Muslim masses, especially those who cannot think independently, CAIR can slide into Muslims' wallets much more easily. By spreading phobia among American Muslims, CAIR is hoping to rally Muslims around it--not as informed and enlightened, but rather, in the way goslings rally around mother goose.

Once again, any sincere work should and must start from the inside out... We Muslims must reform ourselves...

In the long run, CAIR methodology, of trying to build a façade without a sound structure, will--no doubt--further increase the resentment and the alienation of the American public toward Islam and Muslims.

Sincerely, Raid Mohammad
Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (91) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Appeasement is not the way to deal with Islamists' demands [293 words]B N GURURAJFeb 15, 2009 06:34150486
it will never be enough [294 words]Phil GreeendJul 2, 2007 18:39102451
1stop the dhimmis [70 words]jack hawkinsOct 7, 2006 15:2559229
1Privileges, Compromise, Concessions & Appeasement will bring more Islamic Terror [91 words]DhokabhiaJul 28, 2006 16:0851081
Do not fully agree [294 words]AlbJul 12, 2006 04:1649483
To Alb [581 words]VijayJul 12, 2006 18:2649483
Either naïve or treasonous. [175 words]MottyAug 3, 2007 01:0749483
freedom [4527 words]wrs lastNov 30, 2005 12:5429159
1Islam persecution complex [110 words]sameerNov 17, 2005 08:3228524
Source of Mankinds' Battles [220 words]O.C.Sep 15, 2006 11:0728524
Teacher and Muslim school clash over headscarf [222 words]SophieOct 18, 2005 08:3627038
Why don't schools observe Islamic/Muslim holidays? [37 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ryan SonneOct 12, 2005 08:4726852
Question for D.P. regarding "Palestine" [64 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Richard KafkaMay 3, 2005 14:2621965
Which Privileges for Islam? [65 words]Arjun RanaApr 12, 2005 11:5921567
History of world [43 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SulejmanApr 1, 2005 15:5121290
to daniel pipes [73 words]gemNov 12, 2010 12:4421290
Mr. Pipes is correct: Learn from the Indian Tragedy [434 words]Arvind MadhavanMar 28, 2005 09:3221188
In response to commenter Arvind Madhavan [474 words]shariarMar 30, 2005 00:0421188
Response to Mr.Shariar's comments [416 words]Arvind MadhavanMar 31, 2005 15:3321188
uncalled for comments........ [179 words]iqJan 12, 2006 02:3121188
1 plus 1 equals one million [8 words]gemOct 15, 2010 01:5021188
Fitting into what? [82 words]A kharijitMar 24, 2005 17:4221160
CAIR gets away with bullying [90 words]A. WoodsMar 23, 2005 14:5721147
If I may add; do not yield to CAIR bullying [910 words]Raid MohammadMar 29, 2005 13:2921147
How about secular democracy in Saudi Arabia? [30 words]S.C.PandaMar 23, 2005 05:0121134
No privileges [160 words]Sally IrvineMar 23, 2005 01:1121129
Shariah courts and coercion of women [29 words]C.SaltonMar 22, 2005 18:3421123
Divorce through shariah court [133 words]Sadya DibaJun 27, 2007 06:1721123
How much can Islam be Accommodated? [65 words]Peter J. HerzMar 22, 2005 09:1421096
Postal Restrictions for Soldiers in Iraq [34 words]Todd WinteringMar 21, 2005 12:4721091
Stop the Shari'a Courts in Canada [149 words]Andria SpindelMar 20, 2005 22:5421084
Islam is on the rise [23 words]Mark GoldbergMar 20, 2005 09:3321076
Separation of Mosque and State [232 words]John Randall PeacherMar 20, 2005 03:4421074
School prayer [46 words]Kyle De WolfMar 20, 2005 02:2321072
Privileges? [50 words]Dr. Wm. HayesMar 19, 2005 21:5721069
Hmmm.. [90 words]Lynn HMar 19, 2005 14:3721065
Muslim power [88 words]Octavio JohansonMar 19, 2005 12:4921064
In response to Octavio Johanson: I agree with you [284 words]Marcos BerensteinMar 20, 2005 05:1221064
The warning of 2 John and Islamic fundamentalism [49 words]Quennel GaleMar 18, 2005 17:1521060
1Acceptance of a minority culture by the majority. [41 words]Michael CMar 18, 2005 06:4321052
What do you think of the Danish model? [35 words]Octavio JohansonMar 17, 2005 13:3921044
A Crucial Distinction [96 words]Robert ArsenaultMar 17, 2005 13:2621043
Right On [44 words]H. YazdiMar 16, 2005 23:0321035
worship in universities [32 words]nb hershfield FRCPMar 16, 2005 19:3421033
Response to any who object to observing Muslim Holidays [201 words]Danielle MackeyMar 16, 2005 14:2721031
In Response to Danielle Mackey: ALLAH ISN'T G'D [105 words]Marcos BerensteinMar 17, 2005 19:4821031
It's Not Islamic Holidays That I Object To: Response to Danielle Mackey [264 words]Don CastellaMar 18, 2005 15:0021031
Initial premise [72 words]TANWEER HUSSAINMar 16, 2005 14:1121029
to dr hussein [143 words]jack hawkinsOct 8, 2006 06:2621029
Terror [34 words]YovenMar 16, 2005 13:5921027
Evil hides [50 words]WallaceMar 16, 2005 13:2521025
A direct question for Daniel Pipes [154 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Octavio JohansonMar 16, 2005 12:3421023
I have changed my views [71 words]Juan Duchesne WinterMar 16, 2005 10:3021021
Wake up, West! [44 words]Octavio JohansonMar 16, 2005 08:1921020
McGill prayer room [92 words]Denise AllenMar 15, 2005 23:4921017
Need to get facts right [112 words]EssamSep 1, 2006 16:3221017
A point of disagreement [252 words]Gloria StewartMar 15, 2005 21:3521013
There Are Scholars and Scholars [164 words]Dave M O'NeillMar 15, 2005 20:2321012
Rights and Privileges for followers of Islam [85 words]Tzvi TamariMar 15, 2005 19:5121010
Great Info, but... [107 words]Alex MullerMar 15, 2005 18:1521007
Native Westerners support multi-culturalism [173 words]Octavio JohansonMar 15, 2005 17:0921006
Tolerance of all [24 words]William BrainerdMar 15, 2005 16:5721005
Is exclusivity the key for prayer rooms? [115 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bob PenceMar 15, 2005 16:4421004
Amazing! [160 words]JaladhiMar 15, 2005 15:5421002
No Special Privileges [46 words]Naeem DinMar 15, 2005 14:5521000
Thus the Problem [129 words]Timothy B. RobertsMar 15, 2005 13:4220997
Response to T. B. Roberts [20 words]Dan KatcherMar 16, 2005 12:5020997
Great advice for politicians and bureaucrats - if they will heed it! [74 words]M MaslowMar 15, 2005 12:5420994
Which privileges for Islam [98 words]MacMar 15, 2005 12:0720993
99.99% agreement [186 words]Irfan KhawajaMar 15, 2005 12:0320992
Response to Irfan Khawaja: CHURCH BELLS X AZAAN [102 words]Marcos BerensteinMar 15, 2005 21:4420992
Church bells vs. muezzin's call [93 words]SriramMar 21, 2005 15:0420992
1Church bells and azaan [354 words]Irfan KhawajaMar 23, 2005 16:4420992
Response to commenter Irfan Khawaja: Church bells and azan [50 words]N. KhanMar 25, 2005 13:5120992
Azan is different [46 words]SeanApr 1, 2005 22:0720992
rotflol... [83 words]plusafJan 25, 2008 23:4520992
Church bells and Azaan [193 words]V KothariJul 27, 2008 19:3120992
Establishment of Religion [228 words]Stephen BermanMar 15, 2005 11:4020991
Confusion about terminology [123 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jacob OlidortMar 15, 2005 11:0220990
Bravo ! [65 words]Shayel SiegelMar 15, 2005 10:4920988
Schools accommodating Muslim holidays [248 words]Roberta BeckerMar 15, 2005 09:3720987
Courts Based on Religion [193 words]Jerrold KatzMar 15, 2005 09:0420985
Which Priviledges For Muslims [116 words]Dr. Lowell ByrdMar 15, 2005 09:0020984
Normal rights: YES. Special rights: NO [93 words]Paul RhoadsMar 15, 2005 08:5320983
2Muslim domination inevitable [186 words]Marcos BerensteinMar 15, 2005 07:2620981
no way, ever [108 words]AnneMar 9, 2006 20:3320981
No Compulsion in Religion [435 words]That Other GuyMay 8, 2007 16:0120981
Apologies [105 words]That Other GuyMay 8, 2007 16:1620981
forced conversion a reality [445 words]harjitOct 16, 2007 17:3820981
yawn... [740 words]That Other GuyOct 20, 2007 15:1720981
fighting muslim extremists [50 words]DavidMay 15, 2013 14:2020981

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)