Ecological Damage

Submitted by Mark D (United States), Mar 9, 2014 at 23:15

The scriptural command was not intended to cause ecological damage, but it did.

I heaved a sigh. So you see, religious ban on pork has caused damage. Here it is ecological damage.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".