69 million page views

Hold on a second

Reader comment on item: Islamist Media Digitally Cover Up Prominent Western Women

Submitted by Coexist (United States), Apr 4, 2014 at 00:58

Why do you look at only these specific photos and decide to judge the ENTIRE religion. I'd love to debate why you, Mr. Pipes, why you try SO hard to expose Islam through one perspective. Have you ever considered the fact that they could have covered the women out of respect? I'd hate to see a governmental delegate, or popular and impacting celebrity flashing me as soon as I opened a magazine. Hah, in fact, I'd prefer to see some covering up in the US while this topic is exposed.

Look at the Kardashians. I don't see them covering anything up out of respect of the millions of regular passerbys or citizens. One day you see one of them wearing a see through skirt, and the next day you see an 18 year old Kardashian flashing millions of onlookers with her chest in another see through article of clothing (which I'd love to spare my eyes from seeing). Please, Sir, I am asking you from a hopeful light to leave the blemished and paradoxical computer screen of ignorance and inhumanity and to physically ask a muslim themselves why they do this or don't do that. Maybe the world may become a bigger place than you imagined.

Regards,

A teenager trying to give light to new perspectives of cultures, and religions around the world.

Dislike (1)
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (16) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Hold on a second [223 words]CoexistApr 4, 2014 00:58214232
Hang on here. [28 words]Amr MarzoukMar 30, 2013 06:42204824
1Coverups do not have to stop at necklines [56 words]PrashantMar 12, 2013 02:10204216
It does not hurt American interets [195 words]Amit SrivastavaMar 12, 2013 00:54204213
1Only in US/UK/artists interests if it is their free choice to be photoshopped. [215 words]John in Michigan, USAMar 12, 2013 22:57204213
cover-up [80 words]SheilaMar 11, 2013 17:19204208
so what... [9 words]MartinMar 11, 2013 16:22204206
1We don't need them in the 21st century, right? [32 words]DmitryMar 12, 2013 06:32204206
1Modest Coverups [93 words]RonMar 11, 2013 15:43204205
3Photoshop is not the worst offense [110 words]DmitryMar 12, 2013 06:58204205
1Sartorial comments on photoshopping in Iran [164 words]Kelly TwoMar 11, 2013 13:02204201
Kelly has a point ,however censorship is more ominous than it seems [219 words]ShishirMar 22, 2013 04:15204201
3Another kind of "cover-up" [120 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Edward ClineMar 11, 2013 10:36204198
Thanks for the link! [1 words]John in Michigan, USAMar 12, 2013 01:01204198
5To Condone this is to Condone Evil [94 words]FrugalFrigateMar 12, 2013 01:37204198
Thank Heaven for Photoshop! [14 words]D KoralMar 11, 2013 10:00204194

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)