|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October SurpriseReader comment on item: The "October Surprise" Theory Submitted by Jane Clark (United States), Sep 3, 2016 at 13:00 I think you are simply wrong, Mr. Pipes. It is evident you have not examined the evidence of the October Surprise in any depth. The US Attorney's office prosecutes "conspiracy cases" every day, and to take the position there are none in this case is absurd and naive. It is more than convenient that the Iran hostages were released on the day Reagan was inaugurated. Individuals researching matters of this sort perform as much due diligence as they are able considering they do not have subpoena power to do so. I more than believe that George Bush, Sr. was capable of pulling off this shenanigan like many others he has done. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: How amusing to find that someone, somewhere still believes in this nonsense. Reader comments (16) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |