|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A question and a noteReader comment on item: My Website Furthers Computer Science / Linguistics Submitted by rw (United States), Apr 16, 2017 at 01:17 I wonder if someone can explain exactly what is meant by "a possible connection between linguistic syntax and web mark-up"? What does this mean? I am a professional translator, sort of, (published and hopeful of obtaining some remuneration at some point) so the research about translating is of some interest. Anything to do with ideology is necessarily difficult to translate without detailed, thorough, expert knowledge of the area under discussion - which means an ability to empathize to a high degree with your author and probably sympathize as well. A person who can do this in almost field is probably a rarity. For works that are non-ideological in nature, there are different difficulties. An amusing example is the translation of a novel from English into, as I remember, Czech, which when back translated read, 'A man was digging a hole in the ground with the help of a large black bird.' The original read 'A man was digging a hole in the ground with a crow.' Translation is a wonderful art. I remember trying to read Solzhenitsyn short stories in translation. The first translation I tried was just about unreadable - the language was a constant stumbling block; then I found a superb translation in which, as well as faithfully conveying the author, the English was enjoyable. We translators are a hugely undervalued species, and grossly underpaid. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: Can anyone answer the question at the top? Reader comments (11) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |