69 million page views

What happens if.....

Reader comment on item: Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side?

Submitted by Werner (United States), Jul 28, 2005 at 23:11

the USA puts more demands on crack down on Saudi Arabia?

1. Saudi ignores it and plays it game as usual. What kind of leverage does the USA have?

2. Saudi really try to crack down, it uproots a hell and there is civil war in Saudi. Given the position over the holy sites of Muslim what is going to happen, who is going to win, what is the US going to do when there is civil war? Can they engage in a territory considered holy to many Muslim? With which repercussions?

3. The Saudis put their faith into radical Islam (I guess they do that anyway already today), what is the US going to do? Invade? Sanctions? UN? It seems they are not in such a nice position to do all this things. If they demand and pose a threat then they may have to back it up, but for what price? Is there a movement for secular democracy in Saudi? produce a civil war Shias against Wahabis? What would be the realistic choices the US has? Have China haywired because of the oil with its current threats and North Korea with all that nuclear stuff?

The same is with Pakistan. One doesn't have to like Musharaf (I personally think he is not too bad, after all he is military and they are not so different all around the world) but what other options does the US have?

Pakistan has nuclear weapons that is a prize all the jihadis want to have.

So what to do with Pakistan?

Keep Musharaf and continue what the US did in the past. Is that going to work? Obviously Musharaf did escape all assasination attempts in a very volatile and treacherous environment. That means he is no fool. That means he is capabable of something. Musharaf put a great portion of trust (out of pressure or not I don't ask) into the US and the US supports him. Obviously the terrorist/islamist side is after him that means they see that similarly. What is he really doing for the US? Why is he a worthy partner (or is he the best option you can get of many choices you fear are worse?) .

My brother who is a pilot in the german army (and they have good connection among themselves) told me that german forces in Afghanistan were up to 500 yards to OBL to capture him but were called back by american senior officers. Recently I heard a comment from a US government official that they have a pretty good idea were OBL is. Assumed both information are true that led me to the conclusion that Musharaf may have some problems if OBL is caught. On second thaughts if OBL really wanted to kill Musharaf with all the resources available to him Musharaf would be dead by now. That means something fishy is going on.

But what if the US thinks, Musharaf is a traitor what do they do? Kick him out of office and then what? Call for elections? Have an OBL deputy in charge of Pakistan? Invade Pakistan? call the Indians to that? What realistic options does the US have in Pakistan?

I do think the US is doing the best it can. Put reasonable demands on him and support him as much as deemed good.

greetings

Werner
Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Next Comment >>

Reader comments (29) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
If our commander tells us to blow up our own parents we'll do it. We never spare anyone. [940 words]PeacemakerJun 26, 2009 07:06157990
Azzam Tamimi was brave and honest [236 words]Chris HoerstelMay 16, 2008 08:30128823
lets crush Terrorism with iron hand... [660 words]IndianDec 4, 2008 01:33128823
Israel and USA will help Europe to fight the Jehadis within and around Europe... [164 words]Freedon and Peace...Dec 6, 2008 10:03128823
Change the perspective from negative to positive [213 words]Kathie HarrisonSep 25, 2006 13:5757480
kudos [94 words]JamesMar 8, 2006 01:1939311
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side? Art. No.2812 [76 words]S.C.PandaAug 22, 2005 06:0924954
Response to Batya: Lessons in history [19 words]Dan StraussAug 3, 2005 15:5024298
Thanks Monica [18 words]Debra M.Aug 2, 2005 11:5924210
Latest Report of 55 Terrorist Training Camps in Pakistan [23 words]Swahili DinazJul 31, 2005 02:3824142
Realistic View [110 words]Muhammad Ather ShehzadDec 17, 2008 02:3524142
Fighting Daniel Pipes ( and his moderator) [125 words]Binyamin KalimJul 30, 2005 21:4524135
e mail to Monica Crowley [73 words]roy BishkoJul 30, 2005 19:4124132
Obama [7 words]anonymousMar 19, 2008 14:5024132
"I did not have sex with that woman" Bill Clinton [90 words]Robert BryantSep 7, 2012 23:3424132
America and West have a big problem [263 words]F.ShawkiJul 30, 2005 18:5624130
Partial Amnesia [954 words]Swahili DinazJul 30, 2005 14:2324117
Islamists and the West [762 words]NariJul 29, 2005 21:5724093
Fear from Islam [211 words]khanFeb 25, 2007 23:0424093
URDU [157 words]batya daganJul 29, 2005 17:2924077
Not Ad Hominem [86 words]Ben ShniperJul 29, 2005 16:5124070
Monica was simply fabuloso! [257 words]Judy MorrisJul 29, 2005 13:2224050
Tamimi vs Crowley [220 words]Steven LJul 29, 2005 12:4324045
Bravo! [87 words]jon sloanJul 29, 2005 12:1624043
MSNBC: Monica Crowley/Tamimi/You [63 words]Kathryn DrakeJul 29, 2005 10:5224037
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia [262 words]Vijay DandapaniJul 29, 2005 10:3324035
Tamimi is a Doctor? Of What? [396 words]GWKJul 29, 2005 10:0924033
Pakistan [226 words]Donald W. BalesJul 29, 2005 10:0424032
What happens if..... [546 words]WernerJul 28, 2005 23:1124002

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)