We need to tell Islamists and Wahhabis that al-Ka'ba was flooded several times and in 2015 a crane crashed on al-Ka'ba! Are they blaming Allah for these disasters?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 20, 2017 at 13:49

Dr Pipes

Another Muslim Saudi "scholar" his name is Abd al-Aziz al-Fawzan) is telling his followers that Hurricane Irma is one of the soldiers of Allah! Which means that Floridians (Muslims included) must be the enemies of Allah

Here is an interesting video by Brother Rachid refuting the so called Sheikh Abd al-Aziz's drivel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAcpgu7UZ_w

Here is the tweet (Sept 8/2017 so no one can say that we kuffar make things up!

هروب جماعي من فلوريدا
وأمريكا رمز التطور والقوة المادية تقف عاجزة أمام جندي من جنود الله: إعصار إيرما المدمر الذي تبلغ سرعته 300كم في الساعة

But wait: here is the video of the great Ka'ba (Mecca) flood of 1941

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_EZ7pMBCw8

And this was a natural disaster because Mecca is located in a flood plain and indeed catastrophic floods in Mecca are common

And here is a man made disaster where a crane crashed (due to winds and rain not unlike Irma!) and landed on al-Ka'ba and many people were killed

This incident happened on of all days 9/11 of 2015!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X-B4YkkA24

Could Fadilat al-Sheikh explain to us how did this happen? and are the storm and the crane that crashed also Allah's soldiers?

But again Fadilat al-Sheikh is busy writing about computer hackers and computer viruses and that those hackers are the real human Shayateen! (devils)

And guess who published such drivel? It is CNN!

https://arabic.cnn.com/social-media/2017/05/18/fozan-electronic-viruses-youtube

The hypocrisy of Islamists and Wahhabis has no limits

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".