|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nausea at this show, yes, but 1910 is too earlyReader comment on item: Beauty and Nausea in Venice Submitted by Malcolm (Israel), Dec 28, 2017 at 14:40 I share the nausea of Mr. Pipes at the exhibition of so-called art in Venice. This kind of nonsense, however, is an abomination going under the name of "conceptual art" that has flourished since the 1960s. Follow the link in this article to the exhibition of 1910, and you will see a painting by Manet whose striking beauty, executed with great technical skill, should never have been denied. The same can be said of the best of modern art from Cézanne (d. 1906) to Kandinsky (d. 1944). It is only in the last half century that genuine technical ability and the aspiration to create beauty have been driven out of fashion in favor of clumsy attempts to perpetrate a crude conceptual message. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: Good point, but still the roots of today's decadence lay in the changes of December 1910. Reader comments (19) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |