reply to Rick

Submitted by Amitabh tripathi (India), Sep 21, 2005 at 15:05

Thank for your suggestions. But you are violating the principle of natural justice you are trying to become judge of your own case. Who will decide about the impartiality of evidences provided by Christian organisations.I am firm on my opinion that all the cases are far from reality and I can give you lot of examples when enquiry commitees have recorded proslytization is being done by christian missionarries by various illegal methods. Not only this, many confidential reports of government of India reveals christian missionaries supporting insurgency in north eastern part of country as in Nagaland,Tripura etc.Several faith based ngo's are getting direct funding from Christian countries. how this fund is utilised you know well. Mrs Sonia gandhi can tell you better what was the reason behind the murder of Graham staines.
As long as protest of Sonia Gandhis prime ministeriel candidature is concerned that is not because of his religion but because of foreign origin. She never claimed that she is christian but today I came to know about her connections with christians of abroad. We treat her as widow of Rajiv Gandhi belongs to a Hindu family. If America does not allow any person of foreign origin to hold the post of president how India can allow this.This is question of national policy.

Mr Daniel Pipes is doing a marvelous job and I appreciate his contributions, so I do not want to use this forum for some other purpose. I intended only to clarify for you that Christianity in India is not in any kind of danger and whatever incidents are taking place not because of any drive but because of forced conversion. If missionaries are not involved in conversion with some illegal methods why they are so much afraid with anti conversion laws in various states of India and even in Srilanka also.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".