|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Was it or wasn't it fascistic?Reader comment on item: The Rise and Fall of Greater Syria Submitted by Keith McLennan (Australia), Sep 10, 2021 at 20:02 "he denies that the SSNP's ideology and aims in its heyday WERE NOT, as near-universally accepted, fascistic" Possibly you mean: "he denies that the SSNP's ideology and aims in its heyday WERE, as near-universally accepted, fascistic" Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: Right you are. Fixed. Reader comments (3) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |