nevertheless Israel will rather talk than shoot

Submitted by yuval brandstetter (Israel), Jan 26, 2006 at 17:50

There is a warped logic to talking to one's avowed maniacal genocidal murderer. That is if one recognizes that the maniacs are not the true enemy, but the society which breeds them and nurtures them is the true enemy.

Nor is Israel going to clean up the mess created by the West as it egged on the bogus terrorist organization posing as a nascent state, the PLO, to bring the Jewish State down. The West will reap the foul products of the seeds of hate sown via the United Nations, UNWRA, the leftist NGO's, the secretaries of state, and American tax-payer's money which went down the gullet to feed the monster of terror.

Now that Gaza is Hamastan, Al Qaedastan, a hotbed of international terror hailed by the West as the solution to"occupation", don't expect Israel to check the outgoing flood of terror which will emanate from that festering sore. The road-map to peace was the road-map to explosive terror, totally predictable, if anyone bothered to listen to people who actually know what they are talking about, such as the former Israeli Chief of Staff, Bogey Ya'allon.

The maniacs figure that if you talk, and hold your fire, you are ripe for the Sickle. It is only when the sickle is out and blooded that Israel will be legitimised in ridding Judea and Samaria of the terrorists and their families (HAmas) and sending them to Hamastan. In Hamastan they become the World's problem, just as much as in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Is this nice? is it palatable? just as palatable as the transfer of three million Sudetten Germans at the conclusion of WW2.

As palatable as the forced transfer of 10000 Jews out of their ancestral lands in the so-called Gaza Strip.

Will never happen? Watch Hamas make it happen.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".