THE LET GO theory is what happened in 911

Submitted by HARRAK (Canada), Feb 23, 2006 at 19:49

I actually think Muhamed ali is wrong. Bin Laden said he was pleased that the American civilians are hit like the palestenian civilians (his eye for eye argument)...that is obvious. He does not hide his face. He said that either peace every where or peace no where. But the important thing is less to be the theory of conspiracy and the Jews. I disagree with that theory. I just advise those agreeing me here to use the same standard elsewhere in world politics.

While it is wrong the theorize about conspiracy regarding the jewish involvement, one should get away from theorizing conspiracy regarding Islam. Or Syria, or Iran etc...any thing that happens in Iraq now is interpreted by the USAers as being a syrian involvement or iranian involvement product..so that is all wrong..But if you use conspiracy theory regarding Islam, than you give the legitimacy to others to point at phenomenons like Zionism or Corporatism etc..

Mohamed, Not all the people here agree with Mr pipes and you sayying that means you did not read a considerable amount of comments in the forum.

The let go theory is much what I tend to consider. That means that the Benladenist terror network operated under the eye -but without cooperation- of the CIA nor the mossad-. The American governent let it happen to find an excuse for expansionism and interventionism. But they were surprised when the amount of destruction which was greater than expected. democrats sing the same song like me in this issue but with a different melody.

later,

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".