69 million page views

British role in Egypt

Reader comment on item: Palace Walk

Submitted by Lamya (United States), Mar 12, 2006 at 05:26

The review is great, but you failed to include the role of Fahmy and his opposition to the British occupation. You focused more on how the so-called islamic society oppressed the people and made it difficult for Egypt to move towards modernity (which is true only to some extent), however; you do not mention how the British also played a role in taking away resources from Egypt and draining it's wealth for its own benefit which consequently did not allow it to innovate freely.
Dislike (1)
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (4) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Egyptian Christians [105 words]Carol WallworkSep 18, 2011 13:49189392
3Sexism and holism [199 words]Earnest LivingoodMay 11, 2007 10:3392551
3British role in Egypt [84 words]LamyaMar 12, 2006 05:2639816
GREAT REVIEW [3 words]MikeSep 12, 2004 21:2816916

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)