Disagree with the term

Submitted by Mickey (United States), Jun 8, 2006 at 13:35

I greatly admire Daniel Pipes' work. However, introducing a term like "Muslim Zionism" into the deadly game, and positing greater Islamic 'love' and fealty for Jerusalem is simply fueling the enemy and besmirching the meaning of "Zion" itself. I firmly believe there is no genuine love for Jerusalem among the Muslims. The gigantic propaganda rallies are merely designed to weaken righteous Jewish claims to the city. That the future of the Jerusalem itself would even dare be a possible object of Israeli "negotiations" is yet another tragic sign of the secular, leftist bankruptcy which has been so ruinous to the Jewish people.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".