Majority of Terrorist attacks have roots in Pakistani Islamic Seminaries

Submitted by Alexander (India), Nov 9, 2006 at 22:25

Majority of Terrorist attacks have roots in Pakistani Islamic Seminaries :

Sept 11 had roots in Pakistan.

Money sent by wire transfers had links with Pakistan via UAE

British Bombings were carried out by Muslims of Pakistani Origin

Pakistani Scientist Dr.Abdul Qadir Khan was involved in proliferation of Nuclear Technology to rogue states .

Muslim of Pakistan origin was caught in the shooting in Jewish Center in US.

Pakistani clerics were arrested for preaching hatred against non muslims in Australia

Recent Al Qaida plot to blow 16 airliners in UK was supposed to be carried out by Pakistanis.

As per the latest evidences recent rise of Talibaan in Afghanistan is due to support of Pakistan

Few Islamists were caught and they confessed that Clerics in Pakistan have incited them to kill Americans .

Muslim Students were arrested in Russia for cooperating with Chechen Terrorists.

Islamic Jamat members from Pakistan were suspected and interrogated by Singapore Police .

Famous Jounalist Daniel Pearl was slaughtered in Pakistan.

French engineers were murdered in Pakistan.

and If any counter terrorism expert deeply study the history and connection of all the big terror attacks in the World , you will find that majority has links with Pakistan............

In future the Nuclear sept 11 will also be carried out by the help of youth of Pakistan Origin as there are millions of Pakistanis live in USA , Canada , UK , Australia , Europe and they speak good english and mostly are getting radicalised day by day..............

Threats are coming and we have to remain alert and watch them closely to save our innocent citizens.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".