Muslim ambitions similar to Marxist/Leninist methodology.

Submitted by guy leven-torres (agricola) (United Kingdom), Jun 10, 2007 at 04:25

This should come as no surprise to your readership! These 'gentlemen without known fathers' have been doing the same for centuries. They use the same methods as Communist radicals to utilise the law when it suits their cause, while still undermining the rule of the same when it does not. The host society thus becomes isolated and so confused, that it starts to question its own moral judgement. This leads the attacking body to claim 'victimhood' and with the aid and appointment of liberal judges or politicians, over time the situation changes to the advantage of the supposed 'victim'. It is almost a self fuflilling process.

Marx talks on about his dialectical approach. Little do his readers realise that his dialectical semantics changed words to mean what he and his kind wanted them to mean: something very different to the hopelessly duped listener: two steps foward, one step back! The whole process is based upon that simple deceit calculated to change the way we speak and even think, so that we the ordinary souls censor oureslves over time. This is how 'PC' works of course and Moslems:

The Koran even tells them how to..

In Britain my own land, this process has had spectacular societal results. People are terrified of the new 'PC' puritanism. even to utter a word seen as racist or 'Islamaphobic' sends normally sensible people cringing at the altar of 'Multiculturalism' and craving forgiveness for their 'Hate Crime' and 'Wrongspeak' just as Orwell predicted it would.

The Moslems do the very same of course by not only playing the oppressed 'victim' but using doublespeak and double 'morality' too, by utilising the host culture's legal and welfare systems to get their way. They slowly build up a state with in a state and eventually take over. Why this should surprise people baffles me, since there is recent history of this activity from the HItlerarian rise to power in the 1930s.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".