Bibliography – My Writings on Israel Victory

Israel Victory calls not for more counterproductive negotiations leading to more Israeli concessions that spur Palestinians hopes to eliminate the Jewish state, but a return to the historic default scenario of despair leading to defeat and peace (think 1865, 1945, 1975).

I have written often on the topic and collect those publications here. The first list includes my articles and blogs on Israel Victory since 2002; the second one documents the development of this idea in 1990-2002.

Bold type marks the most important articles.

---

1. "The [Israeli] Left's Ongoing Oslo Delusion." Jerusalem Post, April 25, 2001. A first full articulation of the Israel Victory idea argues that Israel, "to end its problem with the Palestinians" must "convince Palestinians not of its niceness but its toughness"; raises the parallel with Germany in the two world wars; notes that "Palestinians will not give up on their aggressive ambitions vis-a-vis Israel until fully convinced that these cannot succeed"; points out that Palestinians benefit from losing, as "Only then can they build a polity and an economy commensurate with their dignity and talent"; and concludes that "Palestinians need almost as much to be defeated by Israel as Israel needs to defeat them."
2. "The Only 'Solution' [for Israel] is Military – I," New York Post, February 25, 2002. The second full exposition of the Israel Victory idea.
3. "The Only Solution [for Israel] is Military – II." New York Post, April 2, 2002. Same title but different article; it looks at ways to avoid victory.
4. "Daniel Pipes: First a Change of Heart, Then Peace." Jewish Voice and Opinion, May 2002. Coverage of a stump speech at this time.
5. "Lost Diplomats Just Step on the Gas." New York Post, May 6, 2002. U.S. policy should focus on Palestinian rejectionism of Israel.
6. "Israel is Winning." New York Post, August 6, 2002. Argues that "Appearances to the contrary, Israel is defeating the Palestinians."
7. "Does Israel Need a [Peace] Plan?" Commentary, February 2003. After reviewing the many "peace" plans swirling around in 2002, a first detailed explanation of "inducing the Palestinians to surrender their murderous intentions vis-à-vis Israel."
8. "No Possible Israeli Military Victory: Victor Davis Hanson" DanielPipes.org, June 15, 2003. Takes issue with the military historian's argument that only the United States, not Israel, can defeat the Palestinians.
9. "Why Oslo's Hopes Turned to Dust." New York Post, September 9, 2003. Offers a "radically different approach for the next decade."
10. "Sharon Loses His Way On Israeli 'Settlements'." New York Sun, February 10, 2004. Concerning Jews who live on the West Bank: "Instead of focusing on this political triviality, [strategists and would-be diplomats] should devise ways to induce the Palestinian Arabs to accept the existence of a sovereign Jewish state called Israel."
11. "Negotiations with the Palestinians Keep Failing Because the Arabs Still Think They Can Win." Jewish Voice and Opinion. April 2004. A report on Israel Victory by a journalist.
12. "Will Prosperity End Palestinian Enmity to Israel?" DanielPipes.org, December 28, 2005. Lists instances of the silly idea that plying Palestinians with money will resolve hostilities.
13. "Israel Shuns Victory." New York Sun, March 28, 2006. None of the candidates for prime minister in Israel seek victory.
14. "How Israel Can Win." New York Sun, April 4, 2006. Follows up on the column a week earlier, with further explanations.
15. "Further on Israel's Winning Its War." DanielPipes.org, April 4, 2006. Thoughts that could not fit the main article of the same date.
16. "Israel's Unnecessary War." New York Sun, July 18, 2006. Portrays the current hot war with Hezbollah as the result of Israeli distraction from the goal of victory.
17. "The Palestinian Economy in Shambles." Jerusalem Post, December 27, 2007. Ironically, Western economic aid to Palestinians hurts their economy which makes them less anti-Israel.
18. "Arab-Israeli Conflict: Peace Process or War Process?" Ford Hall Forum (Boston), March 27, 2008. A talk and discussion on Israel Victory.
19. "Zakariya Zubeidi's Crushed Will To Fight." DanielPipes.org, April 4, 2008. An example of one Palestinian jihadi who abandoned the cause out of a sense of defeat.
20. "Israel's Strategic Incompetence in Gaza." Jerusalem Post, January 11, 2009. Contrasts the failings of actual Israeli policy in war against Hamas with the better idea of Israel Victory.
21. "Victory – An Obsolete Concept?" DanielPipes.org, July 23, 2009. A compilation of quotes from Thucydides forward on the need for victory in war.
22. "Peace Process or War Process?" Middle East Quarterly, Fall 2009. A second comprehensive statement.
23. "My Peace Plan: An Israeli Victory." National Post, April 29, 2010. One in a series of articles commissioned by the newspaper on "What's Your Peace Plan?"
24. "Israel at Peace." The Dorchester Review (Canada), Spring/Summer 2012. A reflective article that argues (1) why Israel will survive and (2) how it will eventually achieve peace - through Israel Victory.
25. "Ending a Century of Palestinian Rejectionism," Washington Times, October 27, 2015. Explains the long and "dark legacy" among Palestinians of Amin al-Husseini (1895-1974).
26. "From the Decline of Islamism to Israel's Victory: A Conversation with Daniel Pipes." JBS, October 20, 2016. An hour-long discussion.
27. "A Palestinian Defeat Is Good for All." JNS, December 28, 2016. A short preview of the Commentary article that follows.
28. "The Way to Peace: Israeli Victory, Palestinian Defeat." Commentary, January 2017. A third and definitive article.
29. "This Is the Moment for an Israeli Victory." National Review Online, December 31, 2016. Why the time is ripe.
30. "Is There a Palestinian People? Can It be Defeated?" Arutz Sheva, January 15, 2017. A response to criticisms.
31. "How Israel Wins." Commentary, March 2017. Published correspondence about the January 2017 Commentary article.
32. "Breaking the Palestinians' Will to Fight." Mosaic, April 10, 2017. A response to Daniel Polisar's analysis of 400 polls of Palestinian opinion.
33. "Achieving Israel Victory with Martin Sherman." Israel National News, May 14, 2017. Responds to three articles by Sherman that agree with the general approach of Israel Victory but take issue with several specifics.
34. "Palestinian Statehood Is Acceptable ... Eventually." Israel National News, May 21, 2017. Response to a fourth article by Martin Sherman, this one focused on the issue of accepting in principle a Palestinian state.
35. "End the False Israeli-Palestinian Parity." Israel Hayom, July 5, 2017. Points to the anti-victory implications of Israel's prime ministers meeting with the leader of the PLO, a criminal outfit, and the continued implications of this imbalance.
36. "Poll: Israelis Want Victory." Jerusalem Post, July 12, 2017. Reports on a first survey of Jewish Israelis commissioned by the Middle East Forum and finds a "profound evolution of the Israeli public since the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993."
37. "Poll: Palestinian Rejectionism is Weakening." Israel Hayom, August 7, 2017. Finds that Palestinians "appear significantly more pragmatic than political in their attitudes toward Israel."
38. "Why Palestinian Delusions Persist." Israel Hayom, November 13, 2017. Blames "a toxic mix of Islamic doctrine, international succor, and Israeli timidity."
39. "Achieving Peace Through Israeli Victory." FrontPageMag.com, January 2, 2018. Video and transcript of a talk at the David Horowitz Freedom Center explaining the Israel Victory Project, with audience questions.
40. "Why Palestinians Need an Israel Victory." Australian, March 24, 2018. Recapitulates the argument, calls for Australian support.
41. "Poll: Israel Victory Gains Strength." Israel Hayom, July 3, 2018. Reports on a second survey of Jewish Israelis commissioned by the Middle East Forum. It finds that land-for-peace is out, "Let the IDF win" is in.
42. "Why Israelis Shy from Victory." Middle East Quarterly, Fall 2018. Offers four reasons – a widespread Israeli belief that prosperity undermines ideology, awe of Palestinian resolve, Jewish guilt, and timid security services – to explain why Israelis do not seek victory over the Palestinians.
43. "Pushing for an Israeli Victory Is the Only Way to End the Conflict with the Palestinians." Ha'aretz, December 2, 2018. Notes the flurry of debate over victory among Lieberman, Netanyahu, and Bennett, suggests this shows Israel Victory has become central to the Israeli political debate.
44. "Tectonic Shifts in Attitudes toward Israel." Washington Times, December 27, 2018. Given that (1) the Left is ever more hostile to Israel and that (2) its hostility is tied to the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza, (3) Israel needs urgently to address that problem, (4) which can only by instilling a sense of defeat among those Palestinians.
45. "Poll: Israelis Find the Security Establishment 'Too Timid'." Jerusalem Post, July 23, 2019. Reports on a third survey of Jewish Israelis commissioned by the Middle East Forum and finds that "a plurality of Jewish Israelis now support that once-marginal idea about Palestinians needing to experience the bitter crucible of defeat."
46. "Should Israel Invade Gaza?" Washington Times, September 23, 2019. Criticizes the current Israeli debate for focusing on tactics rather than on goals.
47. "Reservations about the Trump Peace Plan." Washington Times, January 29, 2020. Critiques the new plan for yet again holding out hope for the Palestinians, though this has always failed, rather than despair.
48. "Annexing the West Bank Would Hurt Israel." New York Times, May 7, 2020. Despite appearing to forward Israel Victory, annexation "buoys the anti-Zionist cause and renders a resolution of the conflict more distant."
49. "A Reply to My [NYT] Critics." JNS, May 10, 2020. Goes over the prior article, making even more explicit the argument for "a smart Israel Victory that goes for the jugular" rather than annexation of the West Bank, which "at this time [is] dumb, [is] going for the extremities."
50. "Explaining Israel's Timid Security Establishment." Israel Hayom, June 27, 2020. A briefer, updated version of "Why Israelis Shy from Victory."
51. "Convincing Anti-Zionists that the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Is Over." Washington Times, September 7, 2020. "Only defeat will convince Palestinians like [Hanan] Ashrawi, and through them Iranian, Turkish, Islamist, leftist, fascist, and other anti-Zionists, that the century-plus conflict is over."
52. "Is Israel Victory Still Needed?" Jerusalem Post, October 7, 2020. The UAE-led shift in policy by the Sunni Arab states still leaves Turkey, Iran, Russia, China, the Israeli Left, and the Global Left propping up rejectionist Palestinians; so, yes, Israel Victory is still needed almost as much as before.
53. "The IDF Opts for Victory." Jerusalem Post, November 25, 2020. The new "Momentum" approach enshrines victory in Israel's military doctrine; time for it to become political doctrine too.
54. "Can the Koran Solve Israel's Political Impasse?" Points out that the Koran is a proto-Zionist document. Besides potentially breaking a political deadlock, this deserves to be better known.
55. "Israel's Policy Should Be Victory," L'Informale, 16 May 2021. Applies the Israel Victory concept to the then-current round of fighting between Hamas and Israel.
56. "Who Won, Israel or Hamas?" Jerusalem Post, June 7, 2021. Assessing success or failure in the May 2021 round of fighting depends on whether or not Hamas initiates another round of fighting against Israel.
57. "Poll: Israelis Want Victory, Preferably without Paying the Price." Israel Hayom, June 8, 2021. Reports on a fourth survey of Jewish Israelis commissioned by the Middle East Forum and breaks them into four blocs according to their view of defeating the Palestinians.
58. "Israeli Victory, Palestinian Prosperity." Letter to the Editor, Wall Street Journal, July 21, 2021. A brief statement of the Israel Victory idea.
59. "Israel Victory Can Solve the Palestinian Issue." Neokohn (Budapest), August 9, 2022. Translation of an interview in a Hungarian publication explaining current Palestinian-Israeli relations and Israel Victory.
60. "Spelling Out Israel Victory." Knesset Israel Victory Caucus, August 9, 2022. Reviews the progress of the Israel Victory idea and introduces a collection of essays on the topic by ten Israeli thinkers.
61. "Israel's Partial Victory." Commentary, December 2022. For 25 years, 1948-73, Arab states led the fight to eliminate Israel. For 50 years, 1973-2023, they have almost completely avoided fighting Israel. Why? Because they were defeated.
62. "How Can Israel Win the Palestinian Conflict? Historian Explains." Jerusalem Post, January 7, 2022. An interview.
63. "Corbyn, Sanders, and the Need for Israel Victory." Hamodia, February 8, 2023. An interview.
64. "Israel's Opportunity to Destroy Hamas." Wall Street Journal, October 7, 2023. Hamas' massacre of Israelis should prompt Jerusalem to obliterate the organization.
65. "Post-Oct. 7 Calls for Israel Victory" and "Post-Oct. 7 Statements by Netanyahu Calling for Israel Victory." DanielPipes.org, October 7, 2023. Two blogs keep track of the avalanche of statements calling for - and in some cases skeptical of - Israel Victory.
66. "My Six-Step Plan for a Two-State Solution." Boston Globe, April 4, 2024. It is too late to fight against a Palestinian state but not too late to make sure it is a decent state.
67. "A Decent Gaza Is Possible: But first, the Palestinians must lose." Washington Times, June 19, 2024. Explains the argument in my just-published book, Israel Victory.
68. "The Uniqueness of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict." Jerusalem Post, July 16, 2024. "Israelis and Palestinians have mentalities toward the other that are both weird and unique, wildly out of sync with reality, and equidistant from the norm for parties to a conflict."
69. "Enriching Palestinians: A Zionist Eccentricity." Jerusalem Post, August 18, 2024. "From the 1880s until today, Zionist leaders have pursued a highly unusual, if not unique, policy toward their Palestinian enemy: wanting it not to suffer economically but to become prosperous."

---

In addition, the following articles from 1990 to 2002 provide background to this idea:

1. "Don't Despair - Middle East Peace Is Still Possible." Wall Street Journal, 15 June 1990. A pre-Oslo proposal to work with the Arab states as well as the Palestinians.
2. "The Arabs' Wall of Rejection Has Collapsed" (with Tonya Ugoretz Buzby), Wall Street Journal, June 8, 1995. "Unless Arab populations perceive Israel not just as powerful but as unbeatable, their dream of destroying the Jewish state will live on."
3. "On Arab Rejectionism." Commentary, December 1997. An early formulation seeks U.S. support for an Israeli "policy of firmness."
4. "Why Israelis Ignore Palestinian Infractions." Forward, December 25, 1998. Holds that eventually "Israelis will realize that ... they must resume their deterrence posture of old. They will have no choice but to stick to the dull but effective policy of making sure that anyone who threatens them pays dearly for his aggressiveness."
5. [A first talk focused on the subject of Palestinians losing took place for the Detroit chapter of the Zionist Organization of America on March 27, 1999.]
6. "There Is an Alternative [to Israel Making Concessions: It's Called Deterrence]." Jerusalem Post, November 8, 2000. Advocates a "policy of deterrence" instead of the weakness Israel was displaying.
7. "No Longer a Weakling: Steps Israel Must Take to Shed That Image." Jerusalem Post, November 22, 2000. Suggests four changes in Israel policy to reverse its "weakling image."
8. "Lift the 'siege' [on the Palestinian Authority]?" Jerusalem Post, March 14, 2001. Argues that economic aid for Palestinians should only follow after they "give up their hostile wars"; until then, it merely prolongs the conflict.
9. "Mitchell Report Missed It." Washington Times, May 31, 2001. Berates this U.S. government inquiry for misunderstanding the nature of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, concludes that Israel is rightly "sending a message to the Palestinians: Give up on your aspiration of destroying Israel, end your reliance on force, experience a change of heart."
10. "Preventing War: Israel's Options." Jerusalem Post, July 18, 2001. Argues that "Unless Israel sends clear signals of strength, the current bout of saber-rattling could, 1967-style, lead inadvertently to another all-out war." Offers steps Israel can take to show strength.
11. "[Building a Wall and Israel's] Quick-Fix Mentality." Jerusalem Post, August 29, 2001. Decries the Israeli unwillingness to take the hard steps needed for deterrence.
12. "First, Accept Israel." Los Angeles Times, August 31, 2001. Israel's burden "is to be strong and to persevere, until Arabs eventually recognize the futility of rejectionism and give it up." "Israel has the unenviable task of convincing its enemies that their dreams of its destruction will fail; translated into action, this means it must show resolve and toughness. ... Such lethal intentions as one finds widely in the Arabic-speaking countries can only be defeated with strength."
13. "Israel May Be Winning." New York Post, December 17, 2001. An optimistic interpretation of current Israeli policies.
14. "Arabs Still Want to Destroy Israel." Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2002. (Nearly the same as "Arabs Have Never Accepted Israel. Wall Street Journal Europe, December 3, 2001.) "Israel now has the unenviable task of convincing the Arabs that their dreams of destruction will fail. Translated into action, that means resolve and toughness. It means becoming feared, not loved."