Eternal Socialist Appeasers

Submitted by George Keselman (United States), Sep 22, 2007 at 16:13

Based on the results of the last election in Israel and a few previous, it is probably fair to say that more than half of the Israeli Jews are sympathetically viewing of socialists. Otherwise, it is hard to explain election of such a dumb figure as the prime minister and commie furniture ‘president'. This has been a problem 70+ years ago in Europe and still remains now.

I understand that anti-Semites from "Progressive" Left or "traditional" Right or Europeans of any variety are not going to give up presenting Jews as all blood suckers and usury lenders.

I am aware that Israeli Jews do not read this blog, but for the rest, not only Jews, I'd like to refer to the six year old, now updated article on the web: "HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST " by John J. Ray http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html

http://rexcurry.net/ussr-socialist-swastika1919-1920cav-red-army-prikaz.jpg

"As you may be able to guess from the Cyrillic writing accompanying it, it was a Soviet Swastika -- used by the Red Army during and after World War I. It was worn as a shoulder patch by some Soviet troops. The Swastika too was a socialist symbol long before Hitler became influential. Prewar socialists (including some American socialists) used it on the grounds that it has two arms representing two entwined letters "S" (for "Socialist"). So even Hitler's symbolism was Leftist."

"In German, not only the word "Socialism" (Sozialismus) but also the word "Victory" (Sieg) begins with an "S". So he said that the two letters "S" in the hooked-cross (swastika) also stood for the victory of Aryan man and the victory of the idea that the "worker" was a creative force: Nationalism plus socialism again, in other words."

Israeli Jews must make their choice now until it is too late which side they prefer to stay. Only by rejecting socialists and their politics the policy of appeasement can be stopped. You would advise me to go to "Jerusalem Post"; however, I know they would never publish any reference to John J. Ray's article.

I apologize for an excessive quoting here.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".