Jonah Goldberg: Bolshevik Conservative

Submitted by Elilhu Davison (United States), Jan 11, 2008 at 07:32

Jonah Goldberg's representation of twentieth century American liberalism as rooted in fascism is a remarkably artful misrepresentation that willfully ignoring intellectual history. Goldberg is talented rhetorician and polemicist but a poor historian of philosophy. Moreover, it begs credulity to ignore, for example, the history of the enlightenment or Wilson's and FDR's anti-colonialism. For that matter, such unappologetic conservatives as William Safire and George W. Bush have self-identified their "democracy campaign" as nothing less than a later-day Wilsonianism.

To say that liberalism is rooted in fascism because Mussolini had once been a socialist says that Goldberg's ...neo-conservatism must be rooted in Communism. Look at the roots of prominent neocons: Irving Kristol is a former Trotskyist and Josh Muravchik is a YPSL alum. ...Jonah Goldberg ...therefore Bolshevik Conservatives? ...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".