Wow.

Submitted by Akram Ziada (United States), Jan 13, 2008 at 19:00

...

Paragraph 1. "Know the tree by the fruit . It is not required to think loudly or deeply to understand the inherent nature of a religion. Just see their fruits" quote.

paragraph 2. "Now You see Islam. Just see their output. Except for the short period of SUFIS in INDIA Islam produced only hate . Everywhere they are the prophets of death ." Quote.

you can not tell people do look at the tree and fruits if you your self are only looking at the fruits of very bias pieces of islam. every tree has fruits that go bad, get worms, or rot. that is the way of things in life but just beacuse you accidenty ate a bad fruit will you chop down that entire tree so that way nobody will ever eat from it again. for all you know if you would have picked another fruit from that same tree you would have found it to be the best tasting fruit on earth. but you will have never given a chance for anyone else to know.

paragraph 1. "( nobody knows how to prevent the butchery in the middle east by muslims of that time) . Pope admitted the fault and prayed for forgiveness." quote.

paragraph 2. "ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF PEACE AND REASONING ! ,THE BIGGEST JOKE FROM 7TH CENTURY ONWARDS."

do i sense a little bias in this ? it is good the pope addmitted wrong in the crusades but if you were any type of person that did reserch before he wrote bias non facts you would be able to compare and contrast that; in the modern days after the 9-11 attacks almost 80% of the world scholars of muslims including people in the muslim community that are similarly ranked in importance, as the pope had come out fo admonish the people involve with the attack. they apologized and pleaded with the rest of the world to look at the hatred and unjust dealings of those involved and not to catogorise them with the true followers of the religon "islam" which in its self means "peace".

i know you can make the argument of " oh how convinient to the muslims to name their religon peace to hide all the bad and blah, blah, blah. the simple answere to that idiotic thinking is to remind you. the name of the religon was there before the religon was even spoken to the prophet. there for, before a single drop of blood was even thought about being spilt in the name of the religon. that at that time islam was not even known yet to anyone except for 2 people, explain that. it was a name to cover up what exactly. unless mohamed could see the future of wars and the future of courupt religon twisting fanatics? i think not .

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".