69 million page views

Only PC Approved Religions acceptable.

Reader comment on item: Islamic Hotels, Forwarding Islamic Law
in response to reader comment: The Sickening sissyness of UK's London Mayor !

Submitted by gordon weare (New Zealand), Mar 19, 2008 at 15:30

All the ballyhoo about Tibet, a place very few people are interested in, this stems from the hippy days of those pot smoking, goat skin wearing, floral VW driving, Jonn Lennon types (Who today wear pinstripe suits and saloon cars - and are running-ruining our nations) - yes, these types read 'Lobsang Rampa' silly books, and the way they rave on, you can conclude they have ALL THE ANSWERS!

Yet, here are they, with this godsend chance to have another 'Grievathon'. isn't it a hypocritical paradox, they rave on about China (give China a chance, it is trying), Yet these omniscient lama's and their western-PC pseudo followers just dont have any answers for this at all, Here they are telling us daily, in their pc 'Rationalisations' How they have all the answers, thanks to these lama's in ostentations religious regalila.

And herein lies the clue - the Politically Correct crowd just Love Religious regalia & pomp. I know someone well who is now a budhist monk, and raves on all the time. He had a heart attack recently, and was panic struck, as was his wife, they rang me constantly, I managed to reassure them well - and I am not a saffron robed lama ! See.. they're so full of religious ostentatious pomposity, seems they have forgotten the stark realities of real life and its real hurdles. Its easier to be a lama in the west than it is in Tibet, as we have the real, Christian rooted safety nets and not Tibet. China is simply wanting to rid all that religious bourgeoise and bring these stagnant lama's into the the present world.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The freedom to go broke.... [54 words]DustyApr 1, 2008 06:53124298
Oxymoron of the Year: "Hospitality is an integral part of Islamic culture" [60 words]DrRJPMar 18, 2008 08:43122926
another example of Dubai 'hospitality' [96 words]PJ MooreMar 19, 2008 18:16122926
The Sickening sissyness of UK's London Mayor ! [158 words]gordon weareMar 17, 2008 23:25122898
Only PC Approved Religions acceptable. [274 words]gordon weareMar 19, 2008 15:30122898
The Socially innadequate, insecure & dependent Islamics. [277 words]gordon weareMar 19, 2008 22:24122898
BBC v/s USA. [271 words]gordon weareMar 20, 2008 20:05122898
not a new idea? [50 words]PJ MooreMar 17, 2008 15:07122871
Islamic Hotels [50 words]hyman peskinMar 16, 2008 05:48122788
Hyman Peskin - have you heard of the Muslim Brotherhood? [21 words]KristaMar 18, 2008 11:34122788
Shari'a Law in US [41 words]Janusz KowalikMar 15, 2008 20:21122752
Hello ? [30 words]BambiMar 15, 2008 19:33122749
Only Non-Muslims willing to Submit, need call for reservation. [86 words]KristaMar 15, 2008 17:30122738
www.danielpipes.org rocks [31 words]hookaAug 26, 2008 17:35122738
To: Hooka [21 words]KristaAug 28, 2008 21:39122738

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)