The Socially innadequate, insecure & dependent Islamics.

Submitted by gordon weare (New Zealand), Mar 19, 2008 at 22:24

Observe closely - now that I have brought it to your attention. The islamic arabs in the middle east.. cannot do a single thing for themselves. Everything is done FOR THEM. Like habitual criminals in prisons, out, and back again for sure, as these big mouth thugs are so dependent on Mother Prison doing their cooking and laundry for them. See they're not so tough after all, they quickly return to mother their prison. Because they are socially innadequate, dependent & insecure personalities. The same can be said of the islamics upon observation. We hear the terms mass-hysteria, but the middle east is a shining example of mass-Psychopathy. I am convinced its genetic ?

I must admit, I am loathe to believe it, but the more I look in another direction, it seems the same conclusion. Like the repeat offending prison inmates/psychopaths, islam is as dependent as any juveneille delinquent. EVERYTHING is done for them, even by the cringing, attempt to pacify West ( this endorses and encourages this mass psychopathy, and little wonder.. in the West we're doing it at home! hence our streets are full of serious criminals, appeasements fail they have never ever worked. Islam loves the excuses provided for them (again) to free them for an open season in mass killings. They seem never satisfied unless they are killing people in bulk, even their own. The hate crazed frenzy of their murder mobs, make nazism look sophisticated. And the cowardly 'world leaders' and the church also, pander to this mass psychopathy, and the startling cowardice shown by the west, especially Britain is the most disturbing paradox I have ever seen since the holocaust.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".