I and you have limited time

Submitted by G. Vishvas (Germany), Nov 8, 2008 at 06:08

respected kman

I am sure you wrote a lot to the danielpipes website - but who has time to read all that? I am sure that you too have not read all that I have written. Nor do I expect that from you.

A statesman, as against a politician, has to recognise problems long before they become troublesome. If Reagan (or his team) had bothered to study islam then he would have noticed that whatever good was given to muslims by non-muslims - it ended up strengthening islamic fascism, arrogance and expansionism. Islam is, in its core spirit, a totalitarian primitive-tribal arabic ideology.

In India we say "payahpaanam bhujangaanaam kevalam vishavardhanam". = Feeding milk to poisonous snakes only goes towards increasing the production of poison.

You may have given billions or trillions - but if you gave foolishly or sentimentally then you ended up strengthening the wrong people or the wrong ideology (=islamic fascism and expansionism).

Islam is going to do much terrible damage to mankind - it has only begun. With their lazily "earned" petrodollars and all the technology and weapons obtained from the capitalist-greedy amoral west they are well equipped to bury non-muslim identities and cultures and create islamo-fascist societies all over the world. George Bush Jr. has been a great help to them. Reagan also turned out to be a big fool. And Nixon was a foul-mouthed scoundrel to the core. That these three were elected not just once but twice shows how immature US voters were / are. (You fool me once, shame on you. You fool me twice, shame on me).

The US americans who sacrifice (and I am well aware of the sacrifices by theses brave souls) are not the ones who rule. Did you notice that?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".