|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
persecution of non MuslamsReader comment on item: Courts: Okay to Proselytize for Islam in California Schools Submitted by donvan (United States), Dec 2, 2008 at 07:34 The history of Muslams treatment of non muslams is clear to all but the Muslams. Special taxes, laws regarding status, customs, clothing, discrimination. These are not open for discussion. Non Muslams have no voice or choice when the Muslams become numerically superior. I have spoken with christian and others who live under the Mu'slam dictatorship in Pakistan. Special clothing, laws limiting where how and when, and what non Muslams can and cannot do in Mu'slam majority countries. Perhaps it is not the religion, perhaps the Muslams are so craven that it is not possible to adapt civilized behavior.
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (17) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |