69 million page views

Minority Favoritism and the US / US Military

Reader comment on item: The Secret Pictures of Senior Airman Ahmad al Halabi

Submitted by Jailer (United States), Apr 6, 2004 at 01:21

Since the 60s, there has been in the military, a reluctance to judge personnel of the minorities the same when dealing with minority crime. This is both in the military as well as civilian left. It actually goes back to the Watts Riots many years before in CA.
The military has been lenient in many Courtss Martials fearing that the guilty party will scream prejudice which is often a ploy of the guilty. The same happens in the civilian life within the Jurisprudence system as well as the Correctional System. The US Government as well as the US Military are afraid to act upon the minorities who have broken the laws, rules and ordinances.

This is a fact of life in the US. In the case of this traitor US Army Captain James (Yousef") Yee if the specificatiions to the charges were solid, that sorry individual should have been charged with Sedition and if the courts martial had done it's duty, the sorry S.O.B. would either be in Leavenworth of better still, facing a death sentance. We are very quick to Charge and find guilty, an individual who is found guilty of an alleged offense and made a scapegoat in order for the US Government to be looked upon favorably by our enemy.

Are we still wondering why for so long a period of time, our military was lacking volunteers? Look at the way they are being treated now and see why retention may be a problem. The US Sailor, Soldier, Airman or Marine will go in harms way without much prodding but this person cannot stand to be wronged or dumped on by his leaders
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1updates on this case [113 words]JulieJun 6, 2010 04:31173914
Re: comment, "Interesting try to twist angles" [44 words]AhmedSep 7, 2004 15:0116728
Interesting try to twist angles [28 words]SarahAug 28, 2004 02:4016562
Steganography for encoded messages on the web site? [220 words]Jimmy Joe MeekerApr 12, 2004 23:0714630
Question about an earlier suspected terrorist [86 words]Ilona MelstradsApr 12, 2004 17:5914625
Site already 'unavailable' [43 words]Tova MatteroApr 8, 2004 19:2014574
hidden pictures [60 words]r.d. kelleyApr 6, 2004 15:3814502
Minority Favoritism and the US / US Military [275 words]JailerApr 6, 2004 01:2114492
Should have declared war on Islamists [89 words]Robert BoltonApr 5, 2004 22:4814491
Pipes is Right on This One [133 words]Mark DankofApr 5, 2004 17:0914489
military infiltration [106 words]donvanApr 5, 2004 12:1514488
Appreciation of article [33 words]Frank L. KorteApr 3, 2004 09:1914472
Defense of those who do not believe in democracy? [42 words]S.C.PandaApr 1, 2004 05:1714452
Arabic language translators. [62 words]MalvinaMar 31, 2004 07:4214437
Tip o' the Iceberg [124 words]Darwin BarrettMar 29, 2004 17:5514411
RE: Guantanomo Bay Spy Update [59 words]CherylMar 29, 2004 16:5714410
al-Qa`idah Infiltration? [35 words]Timothy FurnishMar 29, 2004 12:5814405
A question of Loyality [25 words]KamathMar 29, 2004 08:1214401

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)