Continuing to Misunderstand Israel's Right to Intact Sovereignty to be the Undoing of the American Administration

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Jul 29, 2009 at 18:00

A better way to understand the comment that there is a hardening of the 'Palestinian' position in relationship to the current American administration view of peace with Israel can be taken by understanding of the deceitfulness of the 'Palestinian' position, something left as a legacy from the era of Arafat, along with his predecessors and successors. If ever there was a reason to suspect only foul play from the Islamic forces that ply their terrorist trade against Israel, these suspicions were initially fomented and culminated as part of the latest in an endless series of actions by Islamic fundamentalists to deprive Israel of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Guess who's at the heartlessness of that?

Actually, we need not guess, for the evidence is pain to see, and should be understood for the evil that it purports to perpetrate upon the unsuspecting in the Middle East. It is therefore all the more imperative that Israel maintain its vigilance, depending on no one that does not take the sovereignty of Israel intact and whole as an undeniable Biblical acknowledgment of the Jewish people having their rights to their land.

Anything less than that is cause for judgment on those who would curse themselves thinking they are cursing the Hebrew inheritors of the promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Israel). In reality, it is easier to understand that than that trying to understand the health-care initiative being foisted upon the unwitting American population. Seriously.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".