Another CAIR "wise" statement - denial of the sudden Jihad...

Submitted by Svet (United States), Nov 5, 2009 at 23:03

I always "fall in love" with CAIR when they release their "statements"...

http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26126&&name=n&&currPage=1

Let's "hear":

"We condemn this cowardly attack in the strongest terms possible and ask that the perpetrators be punished to the full extent of the law. No religious or political ideology could ever justify or excuse such wanton and indiscriminate violence. The attack was particularly heinous in that it targeted the all-volunteer army that protects our nation. American Muslims stand with our fellow citizens in offering both prayers for the victims and sincere condolences to the families of those killed or injured."

1. They do not cite the Arabic name Nidal Malik Hasan, instead, addressing the (Muslim- converted or not to be confirmed) as "the perpetrator" as if protecting the ID of the fellow.

It is not certain his religion, but CAIR quickly ran for self defense. absolving Islam/ Islamism from any guilt in the matter.

Then they call for the perpetrators (to) be punished, while there was only one- The Muslim one.

Then they follow up by again looking for some share of the guilt with others "no religious or political ideology could ever justify", as if smoothing off the situation to Islam by inducing the share of the guilt with others, taking as proxy that Islamist terrorists are equal to other human beings.

Wanton Violence: Violence without motivation or provocation, disengaging the criminal from any (Islamic) influence.

The attack was particularly heinous, as it targeted the army, otherwise such an attack would not have been heinous, e.g. against Jews as a result of the "stress" barbaric Islamic Palestinian and abiders suffer when their spoiled manners are not fulfilled. (SEattle 2006- Sudden Jihad)

In this case the attack is not heinous.

Finally American Muslims stand by "our fellow citizens" (Not our fellow American citizens)- which fellow citizens they are talking about exactly?

(Killed or injured)- first it was said Hasan was killed then that he was just injured...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".