Fay Voshell, I was wondering why this blog about Glamorous Muslims women bothered you so much.

Submitted by Dievatchkah Iz Brazily (United States), Nov 9, 2009 at 23:00

First of all, it does not get even close to a Playboy...I do not know whether or not you ever had one in your hands, as a result of your comparison, but if yes, I did find your comparison grotesque, please, do not take it as offense. People's points of view vary.

Secondly, to me it was beautiful to see Muslims women dressed as perfect westerners. It brought me hope by knowing that in the strongest social part of those lands, they are not as wacko as I thought they were. Also, Muslim women can take these ones as example and challenge their Neanderthal Islamist and Islamic men...

Thirdly, all men of good sense, macho in the best of the term, love to admire beautiful women.

Dr. Pipes has this Blog only, so where you would expect him to post this gallery of delights? Yet, important to recall that this is NOT the main point of the article- it is just that b/c it brings these dolls, some beings get upset or clearly frustrated for personal reasons- I understand.

Finally, hunks? Who would like to watch hunks, Muslims, or not? Only frustrated men and women who are disasters in their outlook, as away to cope with their personal tragedy. You know, when others have problems, it brings some relief to decadent minds.

And, your Hirsi, surely is a hero, but does not make Islamists or Muslims change the matter of their kind, if you understand what I meant by that- thus no impact comes along.

As a woman, I may say I'm not beautiful as these dolls- not ugly- I believe regular type. Sure I would love to be like these dolls, and although the article did not address this point, I take their example as a path for improving my beauty, rather than diminishing others attitude...especially if a man type "Dr. Pipes" admires it.

Men in general, category Dr. Pipes (Not addressing Dr. Pipes specifically), but surely such a so special type of men must be special beyond dreams, so why not know what they admire, although I shall emphasize again that clearly this was NOT the reason of the article?

Thanks for listening.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".