No awliya, you are changing your point (is that what you call taquiyya?)

Submitted by klew (United States), Nov 25, 2009 at 23:16

But it's really fun watching you backpedaling so furiously! :D

Your entire post above is avoiding the issue. So please address the point. You started by saying:

> First of all any "tract" of any religion CAN be used as justification for violence
> "up to and including murder" against anyone

And earlier here you continued:

>MY point was that each and every religion can be used for violent acts..

But now you pretendin that your point was that people of any religion point can perpetrate violent acts. Stop lying mohamedan! (Oh I forgot, you must be just emulating your so-called prophet!)

So unless you prove that the buddhist violence that YOU mentioned above is supported by Buddhism I suggest you crawl back into your cave and stop posting such drivel because your next posts will just be too silly for any comments and doesn't do much for your [non-existent] credibility. Oh but guess what, you can't prove it because by your own admission:

> These are some examples of violence by Buddhists klew.. So It is NOT the religion [blah blah]

the violence you listed above had nothing to do with Buddhism.

So let's see how you get out of this verbal diarrhea of yours. :D

I won't be holding my breath.

Peace mate!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".