When the naming of the enemy may really happen

Submitted by Alexander Gofen (United States), May 7, 2010 at 13:26

"(4) I expect that naming the enemy will occur only after a cataclysm ends our patience with minced words..."

Wasn't the 9/11 a cataclysmic enough? And that is under the "religion of peace" Bush - seemingly a Christian! Never mind the current Moslem impostor Obama!

And what about Fort Hood: also not cataclysmic enough?

And what about the recent act of war - torpedoed South Korean vessel by a North Korea? (It is not Islam, yet still the enemy neither named not even acknowledged).

And is this catastrophic explosion of the BP oil rig really a simple mishap?

The naming the enemy may happen only when the rotten minds are changed, and the treasonous illegitimate government is changed.

Alexander Gofen
www.resonoelusono.com/NaturalBornCitizen.htm

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".