Egyptian/Sumer cover up.

Submitted by Lujack Skylark (United States), Jul 9, 2010 at 14:19

Pepi I biblical reign was 2052-2003 B.C. While Ur III dynasty biblical was 2025-1917 B.C. Pepi I had contact with both Gudea of Lagash 2063-2042 B.C. & Ur-Nammu of Ur 2025-2007 B.C.

Ur-Nammu had a dream before battle where he would miss his son sitting on his knee. Pepi I had a statue made of Pepi II sitting on his mother's knee. Ur-Nammu had the first copper statuette ever made in Ur. Pepi I had the first copper statue ever made in Egypt.

Seems real strange one can read Egyptian history and Egyptian historians won't tell you what king of Egypt had trade with what king of Sumer. The year is 2010. Why won't historians make the correlations?

People readily believe there is a Palestinian tribe without researching the facts that the Palestinian tribe was an Arafat invention. It did not exist before 1967 A.D. What have people got against researching modern or ancient history? Ancient history should be read before the Saudi Arabians have it all revised just like Arafat's invention of the Palestinian tribe.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".