Will another jihadi be protected by Obama?

Submitted by Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D. (United States), Jul 12, 2010 at 14:08

So far, all the murders committed by jihadis in the United States and abroad have not been punished by military tribunals. Instead, the Obama administration has provided the cover of Meranda Rights to foreign jihadis, as well as the protection of civilian tribunals. In addition, American Jihadis in the military have not been tried by military courts to date and are enjoying the benefits of free room and board at American citizens' expense. With regard to Staff Sgt. Rashad J. Valmont, who murdered Master Sgt. Pedro Mercado at Fort Gillem, Georgia, it would not surprise me, if Obama intervenes again. Obama is a slow learner, when it comes to admitting his own errors of judgement; he has demonstrated that his character is vindictive, and his arrogance is matched by thirst of power: the United States of America is secondary to his lust for dominating the world: a very Arab notion that is built in the Q'ran.

It is essential that the American public know more about presidential candidates and take the time to find out the background and the psyche of candidates. A first name, such as Rashid, or Barack should be viewed as a sign of potential danger for the American nation. Most Americans knew nothing about Obama, just as they know too little about Islam: it is a religion based on sharia law, a blood thirsty religion that stones women, treats them worse than cattle, and demands total allegiance to sharia: convert the world to Islam or, kill the infidels if they don't convert. And, remember that lies are totally accepted in the Q'ran, as long as they lead to converting the entire world to Islam.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".