Islamic hypocrisy: Pakistanis, Copts and Hindus

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 30, 2011 at 10:58

Our dear Amin al-munafiq al-kabeer who tells us about the priests that sexually abuse children and about porn and wife beating but when reminded that the biggest consumers of porn on the web are Pakistanis and that boys are sexually abused in islamic madrassas in the land of the pure and that his so called prophet married a 6 year old girl when he was 53! How disgusting and that you can find gambling and alcohol and sex in Pakistani cities like Lahore he had no answers and that would make you a hypocrite our dear Amin because charity starts at home

And he told us that the west is doomed ... so as far as we can see he is still posting from a kuffar land and this is also hypocrisy!

I wrote

"As for the Copts i do believe that they should have a muhafaza (state/province) be it Qena (Ena in E Arabic and it is really the heart of Coptic Egypt) or even Alexandria (which is the heart of the Greco-Roman period) where they are in control until Islam in Egypt is tamed."

And this is his answer

>Hypocrisy raising its ugly head there dhimmi. Then again...

You see our dear Amin the wannabe Arab the Copts and your ancestors the Hindus have very mcuh in common today's Copts and Hidnus survived despite of Arabian imperialism and islam and they are the real link to the glorious past of both Egypt and India. It is real Indians (Hindus, Buddhists and Jain and Seikh and Zoroastrians) and real Egyptians (Copts) that did not convert to the religion of the Arabs! You are a wannabe Arab and no more

Now Pakistanis wanted to have their own Islamic state and they have it so what is wrong with the fact that Copts should have their own state too? you tell us ya ayuha al-munafiq al-kabeer?

But again islamic hypocrisy has no limits

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".