manipulation of language

Submitted by sufi imdad ali soomro (Pakistan), Jun 9, 2011 at 02:09

Dear Sir,

First of all, before giving humble reply of your queries, I would like to keep abreast that one should be a pragmatic and realistic, if object is to acquire knowledge. There is no hard and fast rule to convince to any who do not believe in continuity of the prophets and existence of Allah. Allah is a Creator and Sustainer of this world. Prophets were deputed by Allah to transmit message of Allah to all nations with intermittent period in order to not give lame excuse on judgment day . Some prophets were local, regional and others were international. Some Apostles were given Shariah. As Allah had given Taurat to Daud or David (Peace be upon him), Zaboor to Hazrat Musa (Peace be upon him) and Quran to Holy Prophet. Why authenticity of Quran is challenged not others. ? Why it is this misperception prevailed that Holy prophet is writer of the Quran? Quran is in continuation of other revealed religion and Islam has attained its finality. Now, there are innumerable things which it's challengeable.

1- Tell me any verse which is against science. On the contrary, there are lots of verses in Bible which are contradictory to the science.

2- Quran says, all people if sit together, they cannot make a single verse like verse of Quran .Still it is a valid challenge.

3- Quran has corrected the history of Christianity by citing verses regarding the crucified of Hazrat Essa and so on.

4- Sufism is not a sect. Reverent Sufis believes in Unity of Allah and finality of Prophet hood and authenticity of Quran.

5- Please refer non controversial translators and who has command over modern knowledge and religious knowledge.

6- Word AQSA is referred not Qudas, as far as my knowledge is concerned.

7- Quran says, " I have completed your Deen and chosen Islam is your religion "

Yeshua HaMashiach( Jesus Christ ) was prophet and Allah had given him Shariah

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".