How do the media explain that not a single Muslim was harmed by Breivik?

Submitted by DrRJP (United States), Jul 27, 2011 at 13:22

The Main Stream Media, aka the MSM, aka the Marxist State Media, have had a long list of talking points prepared, going back seven years, for any attack that looks to have been committed by anyone mentioning anything conservative, any dislike of Socialists, or even mild disapproval for Islamists.

Actually, make that five decades. When JFK was shot, and Nelson Poynter, the former Editor of the St. Petersburg Times, learned that it was committed by a Marxist, he dejectedly said, "Darn, I wish it were a right-winger!"

The MSM, in coordination with the Obama Campaign, had them ready long before Loughner's attack in Arizona. They had them ready for the Holocaust Museum shooter. Because of the rarity of conservative mass murderers, the Left constantly bring up Timothy McVeigh - a true outlier who was not a Christian right-winger, but an anti-government terrorist bankrolled by Saddam Hussein.

Speaking of anti-government terrorists, the name Bill Ayers comes to mind. If the Left are going to bring up McVeigh, then we will bring up the fact that Ayers wanted to kill off 25 million Americans who would not accept Socialism, And he's a "respected college professor" (*cough* *cough*)

{BTW, the OKC bombing was Saddam's payback for Gulf War I as was the failed assassination attempt of Bush I. Bush II's payback was the overthrow of Saddam Hussein - something he spoke about before the 2000 election.}

Likewise, they have the press releases ready for any jihad attacks in this country, wherey they are instructed to search-and-replace any Islamic references with "he just snapped," or "he was discriminated against," or "we'll never know what motivated him," just like they did for Hasan Nidal, the Ft, Hood mass murderer.

There have been hundreds of attempted and successful jihad attacks in the US that the MSM, aka the Muslim Sycophant Media, have simply swept under the rug. For any that they cannot hide, they make short-shrift of them.

How many Muslim cabbie SJS (Sudden Jihad Syndrome) cases have there been in the past year? Like four? In Israel, there were three bulldozer attacks by Muslim drivers. Now, if a Muslim had been driving the bulldozer that Rachel Corrie fell under, would Free Gaza have named a ship after her in their "Freedom Flotilla?"

IIRC, this was a Nazi-inspired indoctrination camp. Beivik was a former member of the local Nazi party and not a single hair on a single Muslim was so much as touched by him. Nevertheless, the Enemies of the State, the Muslim Brotherhood fronts CAIR, ISNA, and MSA were "insulted" by his "Islamophobia" and intended to use it as a weapon to silence any and all critics of creeping Sharia and Islamic imperialism.

Maybe that was the intention. A false flag operation to blame conservatives and "Islamophobes?"

People in this country - those on the Left - do not know a Muslim from a meatball, and are constantly referring to "moderate Muslims" like Daisy Khan, Imam Rauf, Tariq Ramadan, Rhashid Khalidi, Mamoud Abbas, and {fill in the blank with your favorite apologist for Islamic terrorism}.

Maybe, Daniel, you can give them a solid definition as to what is a "moderate Muslim" in your eyes? (Not that they would ascribe to it).

You could also call CNN's Fareed Zakaria, a "moderate," who also has the distinction of making the dumbest statement ever uttered on TV. During Anderson "Pooper" Cooper's 360 show, he said that "We would not be talking about Obama's faith {Muslim} if he were an old, white guy."

Ya mean like the "fundamental Christianity" of George Bush I?

if Obama were an "old, white guy," nobody would be talking about him - or know who the heck he is.

We are tired of letting the MSM get away with murder by blaming conservatives for the murders by madmen.

But only if those madmen are non-liberal, non-Islamic nut-jobs.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".