|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Democrats turning U.S. into a potted plantReader comment on item: Democrats Fib Again about Israel [at the DNC] Submitted by J. Brown (United States), Sep 11, 2012 at 16:47 There seems to be two viewpoints on that DNC vote: one, that the (relatively few) booers were booing God, and another, that they were actually booing keeping Jerusalem as Israel's capital. But I haven't read about anyone questioning why those two separate issues were combined into one vote. Whatever the theories are about that, it's obvious that they were intentionally combined, since the vote for each would have taken less than a minute. Time was not the issue. They chose to put apples and oranges in the same bowl, and let the delegates "show vote" on only the fruit bowl. My hunch is that they felt combining God and Jerusalem would not be questioned. That many in their party take it for granted that God and anything related to Israel are part of the same anti-modern mythology. But by strengthening the linkage between God and Israel, trimming it from its platform, they were also distancing themselves more from God and Israel in general, and inadvertently severing our roots. It implies that many democrats have forgotten that philosophies respecting God and Israel were the primary rationals, the source and foundation, for the creation of America itself. Even further back, Columbus in 1492 assumed that the Indians he first encountered could be the descendents of the lost Tribes of Israel. The pilgrims in 1620 wrote,
All the founding fathers continued in this philosophy. George Washington was called an "American Moses." Franklin adapted his view of our constitution from Israel's laws:
The democrats are trying to eliminate Israel, Jerusalem, and God, from their vision of America. Someday they may vote in a new phrase, "In cyberspace we trust," or "In jobs we trust." They are gradually severing all the roots from the original soil that held the country together, that gave it a reason for being. But with our roots cut from our original source, they are turning the country into a potted plant. All that restoring the few words back into the platform did was give it some water to keep the roots alive a bit longer. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: Interesting point about the logic of combining the two amendments into a single vote. Reader comments (21) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |