|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
al-Tabari and HarvardReader comment on item: [Defending Lars Hedegaard:] "A Stew of Anti-Muslim Bile and Conspiracy-Laden Forecasts" Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 19, 2013 at 06:51 I wrote "Our dear Amin told us that those that expose Islam cannot do so because they do not have degrees in Islamic studies right our dear Amin al-Tablighee? and this was my question" He he he . . . . another OPEN LIE . . . I have NOT SAID anything of the kind. Stop it and stop your twists and turns and I will leave this remark to the readers to judge you So my queion again: based on your flawed logic al-Tabari should not have written his great commentarires on the religion of the Arabs only right? No it wasn't - THIS too is lying. You made this whole absurdity up . . . .pure lying. Lying about what? But al-Tabari was not a graduade from any university in Islamic studies right? You know who is a liar? it is he who tells us that an Arabian warlord spoke to him via an angel right? and it is also he who uses googletranslate and claims to be his translation right? This came from my post:http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/204163 Which says:"Higgins attributes academic credentials "religious history scholar", "medical doctor" to Rothstein and Mojadeddi. Yet, he omits academic credentials describing Hedegaard." What does this have to do with the fact that Hedegaard is a trained historian something that you ain't you tell me Whilst you overlook completely that Hedegaard is not for his academic credentials as such. But for being a critic of Islam. Sure and you can also say that al-Tabari's writings were tendentious and in favor of Islam therefore his commentaries do not count! Now do you see why your comments are ridiculous? Or even more damaging to your case is that you should stop quoting let us say the corrupted Bible because you do not have education in Christian theology do you see why your arguments and not just silly but they also betray your poor education Do you see why I have no respect for you? "See - you concocted that form this . . . .absurd? Yes. Lying? Yes.k I will leave this to the readers to judge you - - -Rest is the same petty insults. . . . but here - ANOTHER EXPOSITION. . . .Ha ha ha ha ha . . . It is now up to the readers to judge you Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (32) on this item
![]() |
![]() Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |