|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ShaleReader comment on item: Saudi Ambitions in the Middle East Submitted by David W. Lincoln (Canada), Aug 18, 2013 at 18:09 One thing wrong with your analysis, Tom. There is considerable oil, and natural gas, locked into shale in Canada, the US, the UK, and Australia. The technology exists, and at a reasonable price, too, to get it out of the ground. Why not check to see where money is coming from to stop, for instance, the Keystone XL pipeline, and other ways so that countries that currently import oil from Russia, and OPEC, would import less (if at all), in the future. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (5) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |