69 million page views

Dear Dr. Pipes

Reader comment on item: Symposium: The Geopolitics of U.S. Energy Independence

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), Sep 24, 2013 at 01:11

There are 3 primary questions surrounding US position with regards to being an exporter of energy and being independent of the West Asian region.

1. It is not much who sells the oil but whether the medium of transaction is Dollar. Remember Saddam and Qaddafi were killed because they refused to sell their oil in dollars. If the US wants to be independent of the whims of the Oil Shiekhs and Pashas in the GCC , they too could very easly dump the US dollar and start selling it in say Gold. That would mean the end of Dollar as WOrld's fiat currency.

With the huge debt burden already on her shoulders and with the Dollar no longer the World's fiat currency how would the US economy survive then ?

2. The US military-industrial-banker-political-lobbyst complex hugely benefits from the GCC shiekhdoms purchasing their junk weapons and channelizing their surplus dollars in this way. If the US wants to be an important energy producer independent of the GCC , the US military-industrial -banker-political-lobbyst complex would lose it's greatest clients. Can it survive in that scenario ?

3. The US thanks to her abilities to pay off the Egyptian generals , Jordanian monarchies and so on are able to keep the peace with Israel and have free access to Suez canal. With the US being independent , the US military would find it difficult to bribe the Egyptian and Jordonians to continue their peace with Israel and continue their special rights to the Suez. How do you think the US position would affect in that scenario ?

Thanks and regards with best wishes

Debanjan

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Agree In Part [274 words]Kenneth HicksOct 31, 2013 18:23211115
What about Qatar's economic policy and soft power? [32 words]Yael F.Sep 25, 2013 06:01210030
dependence [26 words]y Brandstetter MDSep 24, 2013 05:43209994
1Dear Dr. Pipes [272 words]Debanjan BanerjeeSep 24, 2013 01:11209992
3Comments from an oil patch geoscientist [446 words]Stu FaginSep 23, 2013 10:40209971
Oil Relationships [568 words]SigmundNov 22, 2013 22:09209971
Quite agree.. [20 words]Nazim CairoSep 22, 2013 18:34209945
Good try [80 words]David W. LincolnSep 22, 2013 16:54209942
Oily Ve!!! [25 words]LynnSep 22, 2013 08:11209934
dependence [10 words]FrankzSep 21, 2013 20:02209924

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)