The Qur'an is an edited and corrupted book! Read my evidence

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 19, 2013 at 17:03

Our dear GoD is either not aware that the Qur'an is the most edited and corrupted book oh my evidence? Let us examine Surat al-Fatiha: 3 where it says MLK yawm al-deen

This is what we have in the original rasm which is supposed to be the words of Allah

ملك يوم الدين

And i'm being nice to your Allah by editing the rasm and adding the missing dots in the letter yeh in yum and deen as well as well as I edited the kaf by adding a ء

What a disaster the book of Allah has gone through editing number one and here is editing two and it comes in two forms

1. In The Cairo copy of the Qur'an this is how it appears

مَالِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّيْنِ

Or Maaliki Yawmi al-Deen

Or the owner of the day of al-deen (i left this word untranslated because even Muslims do nto agree on its meaning) and notice the word Maaliki and copmare it with the same word in the next version

And all the short vowels are editing by guess who? The ulama and you tell us that the Qur'an is not a corrupted book?

2. And here is the version in the Tunisian Qur'an in the edited form by the Ulama

مَلِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّيْنِ

Or Maliki yawmi al-Deen

Or the king of the day of al-deen (I left it untranslated)

So it is king or is it onwer our dear GoD and it cannot be both

Now let us see what they tell us about this verse in the Cairo Qur'an

مَالِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّينِ

This is what you will find in the Cairo Qur'an of I forgot darn it the ulama added a shadda or double consonant above the latter dal in deen which means that Allah cannot even spell a perfect Arabic word and more evidence that the Qur'an is an edited and corrupted book

Now let us move on to al-Tabari and this is what he says about the disaster of is it MAALKI or is it MALKI

الْقَوْل فِي تَأْوِيل قَوْله تَعَالَى : { مَلِك } قَالَ أَبُو جَعْفَر : الْقُرَّاء مُخْتَلِفُونَ فِي تِلَاوَة " مَلِك يَوْم الدِّين " , فَبَعْضهمْ يَتْلُوهُ : " مَلِكِ يَوْم الدِّين " , وَبَعْضهمْ يَتْلُوهُ : { مَالِكِ يَوْم الدِّين } وَبَعْضهمْ يَتْلُوهُ : { مَالِكَ يَوْم الدِّين } بِنَصْبِ الْكَاف. وَقَدْ اِسْتَقْصَيْنَا حِكَايَة الرِّوَايَة عَمَّنْ رُوِيَ عَنْهُ فِي ذَلِكَ قِرَاءَة فِي " كِتَاب الْقِرَاءَات " , وَأَخْبَرْنَا بِاَلَّذِي نَخْتَار مِنْ الْقِرَاءَة فِيهِ , وَالْعِلَّة الْمُوجِبَة صِحَّة مَا اِخْتَرْنَا مِنْ الْقِرَاءَة فِيهِ , فَكَرِهْنَا إِعَادَة ذَلِكَ فِي هَذَا الْمَوْضِع

What a disaster he does not know and it seems that this was a big issue at that time and he ends by saying that: We hate to repeat this (the argument if it is maalki or malki) in this subject

The poor al-Tabari must have been frustrated about the many debates about this word MLK

So you know what this means?

1. It means that the Qur'an is an edited book

2. It means that we have more than one reading of the Qur'an

3. It means that we have two different Qur'an the Cairo one and the Tunisian one

4. It means that the Qur'an is a corrupted book because we do not read it in its basic layer called al-rasm

5. It also means that we really do not know what the Qur'an really says so is it Maalki or is it Maliki and it cannot be both

6. And what do you think what Allah has in his al-Lawh al-Mahfuz or his little tablet in heaven is it Maaliki or is it Malki and it cannot be both!

What a disaster

For readers interested in literary criticism of the Qur'an this example really means that the Qur'an was transmitted as a text and that the claim that Muslims were reciting the Qur'an is a bogus claim otherwise we would have one single reading of the word MLK

How come you did not know that our dear GoD? and would you like me to give you more examples and disasters from the Qur'an?

So you see before you tell the Jews and Christians that they corrupted their books inspite of the fact that Allah claims to be the author of the Bible and he also says that no one can corrupt his words, the Qur'an is an edited and corrupted book

How come you did not know that again? Ignorant or and you must pardon me liar?

Oh the word Deen it is a loan word from Syriac ܕܚܢܐ or deena or the correct interpretation of scripture

What a disaster we do not know what the Qur'an really says

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".