The Samson Ethic?

Submitted by Yehoshua Zeller (United States), Aug 9, 2005 at 13:31

Dear Daniel,
The policy years ago was if Israel were to be attacked ,the enemy would go with them as well. Therefore the Samson Idea of Atomic suicide for the enemy. But that was feasible when Israel had borders to defend the people of G-d.

Today's surrender of Gaza makes all possible defense impossible! Torah Codes for 2005 C.E. have come true again. The Torah Codes of 2010 C.E. being The Time of Ends seems more likely now !How and why could this happen?

In 1948 C.E. The War of Independence was a success. Each additional war was achieved because the people believed in what they were doing was right in the Eye of G-d. Then came the schooling and the "liberation" of education of our youths' minds in making the Jew as the bad guy and the poor Arab as the victim. Right in Israeli schools, Jews were the new Nazis and the Palestinians were the World War II "Jews". Such Politically Correct books are also in effect in the USA as well while Muslim books in the Middle East and in the USA follow the good old Nazi propaganda books brainwashing the young Muslims as to who was correct and their holy duty to eliminate Jews and now 'Crusaders'.

Just recently Tony Blair has tackled this problem of Muslim schools of hate, but the USA and Israeli schools still follow this practice of "religious freedom". The youth of Israel are not the same as of the last generation and won't fight back...and especially with little time warnings left and little battleground left to keep the wolf out!

Sirat A, Rasul page 464 : Banu Qurayza Jewish tribe surrendered (627 C.E.) to The Prophet Muhammad.The Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) sanctified the practice of decapitation (beheading) of the Kaffirs by personally beheading two Jews. Therefore the practice set precedent for the treatment of infidels.

While American Jews are getting ahead in the fields of economy and this takes up their total concern,the Muslims will be getting a head in Israel which will be their total concern! Never again means always again,doesn't it?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".