Proof that Disinformation Comes in All Sizes - All Social Strata - Academian Opinions

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Mar 3, 2021 at 01:28

In an age of changing attitudes regarding the now apparent attempts to reframe history to benefit what seems to be a now out-of-control endeavor to commit 'cancel culture' on a global scale, one has to wonder what will become the basis of a world-wide transformation in information technology that is now parabolically out of the real reach of reason, rationale and integrity. As this current baby-boomer generation and the last guardians of the prior warrior nonagenarians and centenarians fall silent to the inevitable 'last call,' the also silent elitists' cultists in the background of the institutionalized perpetrators of the novus ordo seclorum are in full blown efforts to pull off the greatest reformation of human history.

Does anyone find this musing out of line? Then why does such an incomplete compendium, which has to have been compiled from potentially questionable sources since the Dr. has posed compelling issues of veracity that calls for verification, need to have been published as if previous works with greater integrity have already told the more comprehensible narrative in which to understand how we got here from there?

Interestingly, the facts on the ground have already broken the 'code' of where things are going from here. Like it has been intimated in questionable circumstances, the victors do not always get to write the history they cannot preserve. Were that true, Islam would have had their ummah and the Soviet Union would still be here.

The cautionary tale here would be to watch China when they start moving west like the Mongolian hordes of Genghis Khan through the south Asian frontiers: it has happened before; why not again after the terms they signed with Iran, Turkey and the Russians eventually fail. See how easily loose speculation can happen: strange isn't it?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".