Fundamentalism In Denying Basic Human Rights Fundamentally Wrong

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jun 17, 2021 at 19:06

It does not matter whether one comes from an Islamic background with even a moderated sense of Muslim adherence; or to the opposite of non-Muslim sensibilities in which religious dogmatic invectives are pronounced to the non-believers by which termination of the offending sensibilities is demanded; neither have true legitimacy by which the offences of empire are implemented; a series of incidents in which political opposition was deemed inappropriate and sentences to terminate the opposition occurred. This has happened in the past; and in the vein of reader Prashant's understanding of the use of such force to advance the power of empire, the expectation of such volatility in the Middle East remains.
The various changes in world government administrative processes are showing that certain prohibitions to hostile takeovers are no longer considered taboo; given the change in Israel in the face of 'Palestinian' opposition, the presidential change in the Iranian Islamic Regime's control over there and in the proxy changes coming in Israel; the G7 accession to the maneuverings of the Russian empire and in league and intrigue with the Iranians, Syrian, 'Palestinian' and other malefactors all seeking to conquer Israel. Fundamental rights are no longer in view for that was always the first casualty in ambitions of empire.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".