Descendancy of Belief More Relevant in Middle East Than in Areas of Conquest

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Nov 24, 2021 at 16:37

By this observation of adherence of a militant Islamist offender to one or the other offshoot of Islam outside of the Middle East does not necessarily make a difference when looking for the centroid of the Ummah; the exception being, we are told, that when the al-Madhi is expected, then the allegiances will be made manifest; right?
In the case of those such as the Liverpool assailant, who by the way apparently could not advance the cause all that well, it did not/does not really make all that much difference since what ever was being targeted provides no evidence of anything except that people such as the Crown Prince are making a mistake in thinking Islam has any real legitimacy in the future of Great Britain. Great Britain's only real contribution against Islam is the advancement of the Gospel through the King James Bible, the real reason for Islam's assault in England.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".